White Feminism

Modern Feminism is toxic. While I wont discount the possibility that originally it may have been intended to prevent women being left behind by the encroaching modernity of the early 20th century, in its current form it is nothing but a societal poison, damaging for both men and women. It has been thoroughly weaponised to drive a wedge between the sexes, a re-imagined ‘class war’ model favoured by Marxists.

As Europeans attempt to re-establish a voice and a footing for ourselves against a backdrop of genocidal globalism, men are again becoming the leading voices within our identitarian movements, and once again females are feeling increasingly isolated. So perhaps it is time to reload Feminism for the traditional females in our society, a hybrid of Feminism and tradition that both will feel speaks for them as women, and as the feminine. This, I will propose we call ‘White Feminism’.

The emphasis of Feminism over time has been a move away from the true feminine towards a defeminisation, or ‘masculinisation’ of women in which they are being asked to contort themselves into unrealistic shapes, not suited to them physically, or mentally. Media and politics are telling women they can ‘have it all’, and still compete with men, which is not only untrue, but unfair. Men too cant ‘have it all’, men without their core responsibilities would live lives bereft of masculinity – of discipline and determination – and the home would therefore be devoid of men and women altogether, thus sharply ending our race. This would of course suit our enemy, but we must resist their mind control and instead re-organise our societies personally.

So, as the name suggests, White Feminism would be a non-toxic, wholesome version of Feminism, one that emphasises the important role filled by women, and the feminine, historically. The roles now inadequately fulfilled by the state and private corporations, such as healthcare, education, clothing and feeding of oneself and ones family were once the primary concern of females, and essential for a decent society. Over time for example, traditional healthcare was reduced to witchcraft and vilified, until corporations were able to synthesise and monetise it. This is the roots of big pharma, which is now killing our people with drugs, instead of healing them, as the feminine would wish.

Girls would be taught that respect for nature and its age old laws are their paramount concern. For these have always been the concern of females, as they are biologically tied to those laws, and the enforcement of them has historically been the role of women, and the source of true political power they once held.

White Feminism would give women who wish to be mothers an encompassing ideology in which to present decent role models to younger girls, and to show how much strength it takes to be a woman before you become a mother. If girls would like to gain an education, and eventually work, they would at least be aware that eventually they would be entering motherhood at some point, and this would be a goal worth fulfilling not just for themselves, but for their society.

But it is essential that White Feminism be formulated and fleshed out by our women if it is to be attractive to young girls as a prospect for the future, and many of the current ideas being floated can be simply inculcation into it. Some topics yet to be properly investigated for inclusion i would suggest are:
health (both personal and environmental)
bio-pharmacology and holistic healing solutions
spirituality (non dogmatic)
tradition (emphasis on natural processes and systems)
core education (with an emphasis on wisdom rather than knowledge)
needlecraft
forest wisdom, weather watching etc
purification

Perhaps non-Europeans could benefit from the toxic Feminism we find ourselves besieged by today – their world is far more brutal than ours – but in order to increase the number of females fighting for our people and our ideals we must offer them something familiar, stimulating and original, and I believe ‘White Feminism’ is the solution for this.

Fall No More

No religion is complete without its manifesto, or code of conduct, such as the Bible, the Koran, or the Talmud. The religious manifesto is not just spiritual knowledge, it is an ethnic or racial statement for preferences of lifestyle. Contrary to the popular belief that anyone can be any religion they like, religion is racial. Islam could not have come from any mind other than the Arabic, and Christianity had to go through a number of rewrites and re-imaginings before it was acceptable to Europeans. Probably, any previous indigenous European religion or spiritual code resembled the formal Christianity anyway, or at least the basic framework of it. That said, Europeans have an almost dangerous fascination with progression, so perhaps the real history of European spirituality is that of a highly individual experience, constantly updating itself, but ultimately based around the logos of the sun figure, or the eternal, central, life-giving father.

Where tradition is stronger the minds of those who adhere may be said to be less pliable, or less prone to change. In India, where spiritual traditions stretch back millennia, its adherants are loathed to update anything, for fear of losing whatever bare thread of order they are clasping onto, and much of the religious life in South America was spent performing ceremonies, either for fear of offending their gods, or in order to not lose what little remnants they still had of their ancient wisdom.

So what is the aim of these guide books to living, so important that they are said to be god’s word, and never to be adulterated over time?

In the Christian tradition we have the concept of the fall, that is, of man having lost his connection to the ancient wisdom and being cast out of the garden of Eden. This theme is echoed across many religious origin myths, so the fear of moving further away from God (or the Gods) is very real to humanity.

Religious scripture then acts as a training manual to prevent falling any further away from the source, which we all were once apparently a lot closer to. But importantly, some religious manuals also act as a way of preventing any further dilution of the genetic group which the religion is attached to. So the Jewish scriptures lay down strict guidelines on the legitimacy of someone to call themselves a Jew. This honour can only be passed down through the mother, thus guaranteeing the legitimacy of one’s offspring (as anyone can be a child’s father, whereas only one person can be the mother). this prevents any Tom, Dick or Ari from claiming they are Jewish, and therefore provides evidence that religion is not just civic, but ethnic, or racial. This same ideal is practiced within aboriginal Australian society, and the Roma gypsies (who do not on the surface appear to have their own religion, but do have their own code of ethical practices, and show in-group preference for mate selection). By encoding this into their societies through religious tradition they are protecting their racial bloodlines, which informs us that the fall is about racial – and not just social – degeneration.

To this point we can add the biblical description of the Giants corrupting the bloodline of man, until the flood when God washes away this corruption and allows only the offspring of Noah (who is pure in his day) to exist.

So what is the imperative of man that is gradually being degraded each time we fall? What are our spiritual leaders so afraid of that they would write into ancient holy books that further degradation must be prevented at all costs?

I believe it is the European who holds the key to this. Haplogroup research hints that European DNA evolved the latest of all the groups, giving rise to the perhaps premature assumption that Europeans are the youngest racial group. What I propose this is actually saying is the admixture of human-god DNA has in fact only been recently corrupted in the Europeans, and this appears as a recent evolution, whereas elsewhere in the world the DNA was corrupted a lot further back, and therefore irreversable. So it could be said that the European bloodline has the strongest connection to the godhead, or the source of our mission on Earth, the universal imperative written into the DNA of humanity, now lost to some. As a result, the other races are corrupt or stagnant in some way, so their religions instruct them only to remain stationary in their worship and in their races, and not to attempt any revision or move to improve their lives, as if their fall has already gone too far for them to recover. Whereas the European spirituality is still fresh, and, to the chagrin of some, subject to revision and progression many, many times over just the past 2000 years. Even the addition of the theory of evolution has only added a richness to the European spiritual heritage, possibly allowing for a less rigid belief to finally emerge from the clash of ideas it has encouraged.

But the one thing missing from European wisdom is the racial purity that other religions – all too late it seems – know as paramount to the experience, and therefore the progression and salvation of humanity.

I believe the final piece of the puzzle needed to initiate some kind of renaissance of European civilisation is a spiritual belief that includes the knowledge that no one else can truly be a European, and that any dilution of this will only lead to further corruption. We cannot risk falling any further, lest we lose the hard-wired, genetic knowledge of humanity’s ultimate destiny, and the unfolding journey of self discovery that nature and the universe set out on millions of years ago.

Right-Wing Enlightenment

The accusations thrown at those who lean Right politically are usually that they are ignorant, ill-informed, primative and the like, in contrast to the apparently enlightened stance of the modern progressive. For this to be true one of two positions must be held by liberals.

The first is the belief that being Right-wing is somehow unintelligent. If we are to accept what the liberal says on face value, then they have only come to their position through education, implying that they too were once an unintelligent, racist, bigot. Of course, this also implies that the Right-wing position is in fact the natural position we are all born with, and only through education does one learn to not be Right-wing. This supports our belief that we are all born with preferences, born unequal etc, and therefore there is actually nothing wrong with being that way. If the liberal was to admit he may have previously held contrary beliefs he would then also have to show some compassion for his fellow men and women, rather than the scorn and violence he does now, otherwise, he has learnt nothing.

The other position they may hold is that we are all born completely equal, devoid of any preconditioned responses, and so therefore liberal. But they must then question that if everyone is born like them, if everybody starts out equal, if there are no genders, if racism is a learned behaviour then it is they who are uneducated, for they didnt reach their position through studying the facts in front of them, they have always just been a blissfully ignorant social animal, a progessive liberal, free of the sin of prejudice, but also bereft of any ability to think beyond their basic programme. In this case, it is those on the Right who are the educated ones, who have broken free from the thoughtless prison of the base human reactive mind.

For reasons too numerous to list here, I believe that we are born with the political views we hold, that is, the political system of Left versus Right is a product and expression, or externalisation of the human mind. Through social subversion we have been persueded, or coerced into acting against our best interests. With the removal of the social control mechanisms we would find that the majority of Europeans had a similar worldview, which is that nationalism and conservation of ones race is our default mindset, and our acceptance of this nature the enlightened mindset.

Sure, some Europeans are born liberal, but in the past these low numbers were outcasts, or quietly removed themselves. Over time, through continued patriotic wars the most vocal (and Right-wing) of our people were taken out of society until it was possible for a small group of naturally Left-thinking people to gain enough influence socially to shift political thought, and more importantly, direct our education (to divert our natural tendencies).

Fear not, as current generations are now bringing the pendulum back towards the Right, in large part thanks to the internet breaking the monopoly on education and information that had been put in place. Time is now ticking for the Left, and in many ways the outcome is inevitable for white people. White nationalism is the only position that will lead to our next renaisance. Ignore the social program and embrace the future.