The Masculine & The Feminine

The masculine and the feminine are naturally complementary positionalities. These primal attitudes are present in both men and women, and if they are not in proper balance, the total organism is disrupted. The unrealized individual is forever at the mercy of these imbalanced forces. This striving for balance is a crucial duty that esoteric and religious philosophies are predicated upon.

It is not possible to truly understand receptivity, and furthermore, weakness, without also knowing independence and strength. Neither should be embraced at the exclusion of the other – rather, both must be understood to be integrated properly.

Men and women must approach these attitudes differently. As a man, one must hold fast to maleness, even when integrating the feminine aspects of the psyche. The inverse is true for women. Otherwise, one may fall into delusions of “gender fluidity” while on the path to integrity. This is a pitfall that must be avoided, because it is both a trap and a distraction.

Neither of these principles can be eliminated, as they exist in the heart of Nature itself.

In regards to women, there exists an incredible peer pressure that women naturally exert upon each other (and which is amplified by media). This is a major obstacle to integral spirituality for white women.

Men require challenges, and they require recognition for meeting those challenges. This is something that a feminist cannot truly understand, and instead seeks to fundamentally undermine.

Men naturally resist these tactics. However, as men, we must not attempt to treat women as mere property. We must assert a positive, assertive masculinity in order to subdue the wantonness that is an inherent part of a woman’s changeable nature. If this can be achieved, then one may be gifted with healthy sexual and marital relations.

Just like men, women face unique challenges. Women have a sense of emotional depth quite rare in men and they anticipate the feelings of others very well. However, women have been estranged from their feminine nature, just as men have been from their masculine nature. Many women have integrated a “shrewish” nature through the pernicious influence of unbalanced feminism.

This is actually a survival mechanism for women in the modern world, because feminine consensus is now largely built on control over men. The influence that women naturally needed to exert over men to rein in their wild masculine tendencies and keep them focused on family needs has been turned against them in the form of modern feminism. This toxic extension of basic rights for women is destroying the social order by eroding its foundations.

Women, like men, need to be placed in conditions that employ and maximize their strengths, and be respected for that role. In the case of women, respect comes from the ardor of the man, and the harmonious connection to other women, where for men, it is due to mutual admiration and the pursuit of skillful feats (whether mental or physical).

If a society invokes a spiritual balance through its extant culture, adherence to the duty of balance naturally arises. The instincts of man and woman must be allowed to flow into the societal system or chaos inevitably results.

Advertisements

Concerning Hyperborean Spirituality – Part 2

[Note: This article also contains modified contributions by beserkerguru & cairbethebard]

The hyperborean peoples have been said to be cursed with the “mark of Cain” because of their strong exploratory, conquering, and resistant natures. However, due to such tendencies, we are unique in being both willing and capable of both creating new systems when needed, and changing existing systems to adapt to new situations.

It is important to realize that spiritual aspirations and spiritual realization ARE compatible with political stances, aims and memetic activities. The fact is, integral thinking is not incompatible with both critical thinking and race realism. This delusion is part of the (((control structure))) that limits our people from realizing their potential.

False Dichotomies

We are supposedly limited to either/or propositions – being spiritual vs practical, worldly vs mystical. These are examples of false dichotomies.

False dichotomies are everywhere in the socio-political landscape, because they are useful tools to shape public opinion, sentiment and ultimately, group activity. They trap us in unnecessary quandaries without end.

The prevailing social narrative consists of a trap that presents us with a false dilemma. This paradigm forces individuals to choose between their innate tendencies of subjective preference, and those of objective analysis. This is framed as a struggle between the desire to relate, sympathize, and integrate, and the impulse to evaluate, judge, and restrict.

These principles are not mutually exclusive. We possess both of these inherent impulses, and both of these impulses are absolutely necessary to both our individual, tribal, and species survival. We are both are analyzers AND sympathizers, not either-or!

The contrast between preference and dislike is a fact of relative existence. Every person has things they prefer, and things they reject, as well as possessing relative strengths and weaknesses.

We cannot effectively employ one of these qualities without the other. If you focus only on that which you like, you become weak, negligent, hyper-accommodating: a “snowflake”. If you focus only on what you dislike, you become captious, hard, uncaring – the so-called “extremist”.

The illusory division between tolerance and criticalness artificially divides a single continuum of decision: that of memory. To rely on only one pole of this line is to lose integrity: the ability to discern what is beneficial as well as what is necessary, not just one or the other.

Relying solely on preference is dangerous. For example, any “subjective science”, that is, a science where preference is inserted into the scientific method, is doomed to fail. Letting such an ideology run wild can cause severe harm.

Likewise, any “objective” or “hard scientific” means of understanding inter-relationship, feelings/emotions and motives can never truly be comprehensive, because it lacks a crucial component: that of subjective affinity. This cannot be accounted for with mere statistics.

Reflection & Action

The fact is: ignoring the plight of our people is to neglect a both a material and a spiritual duty.

Activism must coexist with the quest for spiritual realization, because otherwise it can trend downwards into the negative, into divisivneness, negativity, and blackpilling.

Also, we must fuse real world action with online presence. This means that you must make active use of your understanding of the world situation whenever the opportunity presents itself.

This doesn’t mean being a fanatic. Neither mere ideology nor simple organization will work on their own, they must fit together. The means by which they will fit together and obtain supremacy is through conventionality – that is, through being widely accepted.

Oppositional tactics are not the only means to obtain the goals which we seek, although they may, at times, be required. Conceptual acceptance is a crucial medium.

As hyperborean philosophers, we must present an ideology that is explicitly NOT intended to mesh with existing philosophies. This is deliberate, in order to create a separate or “counter-current” to so called “judeo-christianity” and other milquetoast ideologies.

Christianity & Tradition

A traditional orientation fundamentally resists such upstarts as “new age” movements and atheism, viewing these beliefs as based in fantasy, not fact. Of course, it is important to point out that agnosticism is not atheism, because it does not assume total certainty, where atheism flatly rejects the Divine concept.

Christianity is certainly a traditional ideology, but its current expressions are clearly flawed, incomplete, and misguided, and are therefore its institutions are unable to cope with spiritual atrophy. The authorities in these circles often lack a deep spiritual understanding.

Christianity is essentially a group religion, where people gather to worship. Churches are both community nexii as well as nodes in the Christian network. This is a valuable resource, when it is vitiated with enthusiasm and inspiration.

However, due to the decay of this community, the Christian network has also withered. A side-effect of this is that the spirituality of the people of said communities was also negatively affected.

However, the existing Christian communities should not be discounted, for they contain many good, spiritually-oriented people, who recognize the decay of the religion at large.

Individual Seeking & Ethics

Many traditions encourage a personal (or apprenticeship-based) spirituality. Such individualist philosophies often lack a firm code of ethics, which is detrimental to their spread in a wider societal context.

It is important to have a strong-yet-flexible spiritual code of ethics. It is also crucial to provide imagery and ideology that speaks to the current rise of decadence, as well as recognizing God’s indifference to destruction when the people are likewise indifferent.

All spiritual systems and disciplines are relative analogs of one another. They all seek the transcendent Source. However, this Source already provides the means of fundamental orientation for the life of sentient beings, however cryptic its mandate may appear.

Any codified system is simply an externalization of the internal realization of its founders. Although all may discover the truth of spiritual essence, few in this age do so. The light in said systems often dies out when the successors are spiritually flawed or empty.

It is the duty of a spiritual warrior to preserve the integrity of spirituality, so that future generations may benefit, just as it is the duty of the artist to preserve the qualities of thought-provocation and beauty in culture.

This duty implies both a duty to one’s own integrity, as well as to serve the integrity of the community. For those with “conservative values”, these virtues are already an imperative, so a hyperborean spirituality seeks to support them with an uplifting and factual spiritual ideology.

The individual who discovers Truth, the essence of Natural Law and the knowledge of the Self, is much better equipped to resist degeneracy and corruption, while also actively participating in a positive brotherhood (or sisterhood).

The balance between the spiritual and physical levels of our experience allows for a culture to flourish.

The exploration of “inner space” is as important as action in the physical world. We must permit entheogenic exploration among those who are naturally equipped for such sojourning.

To cultivate a personal relationship with Spirit, and to engage it consciously, is to achieve a state of empowerment beyond the mundane. If society was structured with all of this in mind, the ability to subtly affect manifest existence for the benefit of our fellows would be substantially improved.

We need to learn to apply ourselves, how to spiritually preserve our environments and our people, and this transformation must begin with the individual. All power is vested in the individual, the incarnation (through fractal iteration) of Divinity on Earth.

An integral spirituality must have, in order to persist, a primarily individual foundation that is thereafter oriented towards the group, and only then extended to the collective.

​Memes and the Post-Riot Age

At the turn of the century a new form of media rose that virtually obsoleted the dominant media form which had a stranglehold over information for the past 100 years. News print, television and film have all suffered with the rise of the internet, and rightly so, as their deadly machines have been increasingly co-opted to serve a corrupted establishment, and their subversive and destructive agenda.
The internet has provided the world, particularly the Western world, with a new form of protest – the meme. Originally conceived by Richard Dawkins in his seminal work ‘The Selfish Gene’, a meme is the cultural equivalent of a gene (its similarity in name is no coincidence). Whereas genes are information passed down genetically from generation to generation, memes are information passed down through cultural means. The old joke “an Englishman, in Irishman and a Scotsman..” is a meme in that the same joke will be told in Iran as “an Iranian, an Iraqi and an Israeli…”. the framework which exists underneath the outer dressing is the meme.

As the internet has grown certain figures, images or icons have been used again and again to express a similar idea, universally understood by users. One such meme is Pepe the frog, who recently rose to prominence with the Donald Trump campaign. Many Trump supporters took control of the Pepe meme, which has existed on the internet for at least a decade, and used it as a form of protest against their enemies, to great effect.

In the 21st century protests, marches and their inevitable outcome, the riot, are now the reserve of angry, impulsive minority groups, which gives them the unconscious appearance in the European psyche of being course, rash, or crude forms of political or social expression. The meme has become a vastly superior sophisticated form of protest or psychological warfare to Europeans. The blatant lack of ability to understand and use memes by minority groups is painfully obvious.

Typical ‘black meme’

There are many in the European struggle who puzzle at the apparent apathy of their people to enact a response to the current situation, and it may seem that this lack of interest amounts to their certain death, at the hands of more energetic groups. Europeans have been through everything at least twice, their racial memory – always picking up subtle cues from the environment – is well aware of the amount of energy one expends when organising protests and marches and the such, and the relative futility of them in the face of the enemy. Europeans have become more nuanced in their behaviour and less physically obvious in their response to situations in which they are threatened. Once they had crusades and decades long wars, then revolutions, civil wars, pogroms, and short, large-scale ground offensives – each time becoming faster and more precise in the execution of the solution to the problem at hand. Europeans have faced their enemy many times before, and to respond the same way each time would be madness.

Europeans play politics like chess, reserve ones energy for the time when it will be most needed, and then, in as few decisive moves as possible, change the game. There is no longer any sense in bursts of energy, as these deplete vital stores and leave one unable to fully push back when needed. Instead, they suffer the spears and arrows, the constant insults and disrespect, the denigration and dismissal of their culture and the destruction of their civilisation, because they know deep down inside when the time is right they will strike back, and it will be devastating.

Iconography As Narrative-Shaping

Any symbol has the power to change the minds of those who view it. A symbol is even more powerful if that symbol has associations not explicitly stated in the depiction itself.

Abstraction is the means to compress information, and is one of the most powerful means of sharing ideas. Associations build around symbols and spontaneously become astral attractor fields (memes – in the broad sense of the word).

When crafting symbols, be aesthetic, and be clear on what the symbol means to you. To clarify: it is not initially important what a symbol means to others. Never craft a symbol with others in mind. First, have a clear idea of what it means TO YOU.

Obviously, what it means to others will rapidly become important. But without knowing its inherent associations, an abstract symbol is lacking in initial potency.

WHAT DOES THE ABOVE SYMBOL MEAN TO YOU?

The modern American flag is a powerful symbol. However, it is a diffused symbol, meaning that it has widely different connotations for different people. It may represent pride, angst, suffering, patriotism, comfort, nostalgia, confusion, happiness, sadness or a host of other things. But those who crafted the symbol initially had a clear idea of what it meant TO THEM, and this formed the foundation of the edifice of the symbol.

The symbol makers in charge of society work overtime to produce powerful symbols, and you should do the same.

The above symbol is from the 90’s TV Series “Space: Above and Beyond” – it indicated a right-wing nationalist movement in France in a fictitious future.

We desperately need a better and clearer class of symbols, ones that resonate with an integral ethos, and that serve the aims of the 21st century hyperborean man.

The creation, cultivation and diaspora of symbols is a MAJOR activity of mankind. Take care in crafting your symbols and examining what the symbols you encounter may represent, and what they mean to you.

Don’t let your symbols be defined by others, or limited to half-assed memes. Cultivate and propagate. Let the best symbols win.

Don’t let these be the symbols that will come to historically define us.

 

Beating The Black Pill

There is a tendency, in these days of increased awareness when one has taken so many red pills, that one simply cannot be any more woke. Life then takes on a new hue – nothing is surprising, everything is predictable, and hope of any real change in our current state seems totally lost.

It is at this time that it begins to feel like all those red pills just add up to one big black pill. Stuck in your throat, it chokes your ability to express yourself in normie company without being called pessimistic, or finding yourself constantly accused of being in a dark mood.

Ive personally watched several heavily red pilled individuals get so black pilled that they cant get themselves back out of that miserable hole, and after a prolonged period in this state, another, more dangerous phase emerges. This is what we will call the “irony pill”, which shouldn’t be confused with the “iron pill”.

The iron pill demands white men pick themselves up and start to take life seriously in order to make a difference in the world, whereas, in stark opposition, the Irony pill essentially turns one into an irony bro, that is, everything becomes ironic. All the red pills reverse; race mixing becomes an imperative, white genocide an aim, and civilisation a joke. Id even go so far as to suspect that irony bros begin to experiment with homosexuality, if not becoming full blown homosexuals.

So what is the way out of this dead end, just as destructive as the blue pills endlessly forced on us from birth?

The solution I propose is for one to find some kind of creative outlet for your woke frustration, a form of escape that will allow you focus on something other than the incessant cultural programming. Paint, make films, music, or write a story, anything that takes you away from the day to day, and puts you in a much needed personal and imaginative space. The red pills have gone so deep anyway that you wont be able to avoid making something meaningful and rich in symbolism, both consciously and unconsciously.

There will always be Alt-Right podcasts, analysis, charts, parody songs, memes and infographics which concentrate heavily on the political side of things, but artistic expression can express these same ideas in a non-political setting, and is a valuable part of any movement, as well as a time-honoured, admirable tradition in the West. It may also go some way towards reaching other, more normie people, and helping them better understand and digest the things you are aware of, which is, afterall, what is more needed in our struggle than more gay ironybros.

One Does Not Simply Ask For One’s Freedom

The following passage is taken from pages 57-58 of Personality and Evolution, by Stan Gooch:

‘The Ego, ideally, bears its sufferings in silence and without complaint. Again, ideally, it does not break this silence even under torture. It does not request mercy. Nor does it request freedom – it simply takes it, or dies in the attempt. ‘Let my people go’ is the request of the Self. (And one must report, sadly, that those who merely ask for their freedom do not usually get it.)

There is, indeed, a sense in which the Self does not want to be free and in which it enjoys its suffering. This is a statement one must make with caution – for, though it is, I believe, in a certain sense true, it is the kind of statement which is apt to be only too useful as fascist propaganda. Is one saying, for example, that the Jews enjoyed the concentration camps of the last war? Or that Negroes wanted to be shipped as slaves to America and elsewhere, there often to die of starvation and mistreatment? That obviously goes much too far. Yet there is a sort of truth here. There is a joking question which asks : “What does a Jew fear more than persecution?” to which the answer is : “being overlooked.” And something of this is true, I think, also of women. Some women, at any rate, seem willing to accept a good deal of physical violence and other ill-treatment from the men they love. The wanting of punishment or suffering has in fact obtained clear recognition, not only in clinical psychology, but in common parlance, with the term ‘masochism’. A masochist is a person who, in some sense of the terms, enjoys suffering and invites pain.’

For the purpose of this essay I will be referring to Gooch’s theory on the human mind, which simply proposes that it is comprised of two systems, the Ego and the Self. In short the Ego can be roughly equated to a daytime, conscious, linear, masculine brain, located in the cerebrum and the musculature of the body, whilst the Self can be equated to a nocturnal, unconscious, irrational, feminine brain, located in the cerebellum, and the autonomic responses of the body – the reflexes, the senses, the viscera etc.

Some populations of the world are led more by the Self, and some by the Ego. But every one of us contains both at all times. It’s the essence of human. Across the world, where cerebellar activities such as ‘soul’ singing, dancing and the use of emotional feelings to describe one’s state are more popular, we can say these people, as a whole, are more driven by the Self. And where we find a greater propensity for cerebral activity, such as technical discussion or time-regulated tasks, as well as a sense of individuality, we will find people who are more Ego-dominant. Incidentally, on average, men are more ‘Ego’ focused and women more ‘Self’ focused.

Americans asking for their freedom

Getting back to our point, the notion of freedom, to an Ego dominant individual, is inherent in his personality. The very idea that another individual doesn’t have freedom is incredulous. How can you not have something that you were born with, he will say? How can you let someone (whom you have not contracted with) tell you what to do? For individual freedom is indeed a natural state for the Ego dominant personality. A Self dominant personality, on the other hand, is naturally submissive (lacking a dominant internal Ego), and so practically requires a master to give him the discipline required in an Ego dominant system, such as the West. If we apply Gooch’s theory to our world, then we begin to understand why some people just can’t be free.

Take the current situation in America for example (and to some extent across the Western world). Radical, separatist African-Americans, or at least their latest incarnation known as Black Lives Matter, are asking for the American establishment to give them the same privileges and freedoms apparently only allowed by white Americans. The question that no one seems to ask is why don’t they simply walk away from their oppressors and start their own country somewhere else? Isn’t this exactly what the white American people had to do in order to free themselves from their former master England? Break off all ties and never speak again, or at least until the dust had settled and they had found their own identity as a cohesive, separate nation. Of course, it wasn’t easy, but the end result was vastly more freedom than they had been previously ‘allowed’ by the English. They never complained during the hardest years, neither did they ask England to save them during events such as the great depression, they suffered their pain in silence rather than buckle under and crawl back in a submissive position.

Black people resisting

Black Lives Matter (along with many other ‘oppressed’ Self groups) talk about forming resistance (which is at least a step up from ‘assistance’). But resistance is exactly what they don’t need to be doing. Why would someone want to remain a part of a system that supposedly treats them with such abject disrespect, and always has? Resistance is the language of the willing victim, for it is only someone who wants to be accepted by the system who feels they have something to resist in it. They could apply their full force in resistance but eventually they will expend all their energy and the age-old system will still be there. If you wish to make yourself an enemy of the masters, who hold all the power, you will, inevitably, lose. The only way to negate the effect of the system is to totally remove oneself from it, and refuse to interact with it ever again. Of course, this would also mean no more special rights and privileges such as welfare, free schooling, access to jobs etc, but after a few years hard work they would be truly self-reliant, self-sufficient, and free.

The same argument can be applied to Israel, and the Jewish populations of the West. Historically, almost every Jewish population has claimed to have suffered oppression under their host nations. Even as far back as ancient Egypt we find Moses tasked with freeing his people from slavery (((which they had apparently been placed under for no reason))). The question is, if the West is so anti-Semitic, why don’t they simply move to their own country which they fought so hard for (and continue to fight for), and never have contact with the so-called evil Europeans again? Could it really be true that some people relish their place in society as the eternal victim, using it to milk assistance from the countries who are simultaneously accused of abusing them?

Is it then the fault of the ‘oppressive’ Ego-led, self-responsible Europeans, with their ‘one man’ mindset, or is it the fault of the ‘oppressed’ Self-obsessed peoples of the world, with their ‘one world’ mindset? In reality, it is no ones ‘fault’. It is simply a ‘fault’, or more correctly, a ‘feature’ in the genetic make up of each human race that is responsible for their actions and reactions. Only our recognition of this hard-wired precurser can prevent us from repeatedly making the same historic mistakes, over and over.

The Issue of Hyper-Tolerance

In recent history, mainstream western society has placed a high value on inclusiveness. This preference is evident throughout popular culture.

It is currently considered more worthwhile to be sympathetic than it is to be accurate. There exists a ridiculous social condition where the status quo rests on tolerance. However, this tolerance extends only to others who also share the same “tolerant” values.

Is this true tolerance?

The value placed by society on critical thinking and cautious tendencies is significantly less than that placed on personal preference and tolerance in the present era. This tendency is hindering scientific education and progress, while also casting its dark shadow over the socio-political landscape.

There appears to be a widespread idea that “negativity” is inherently bad, and to be avoided. As a society we often say “yes”, when we should be saying “no”. This is an indication of excessive reliance on being tolerant.

Utilizing political correctness as the ideal for managing society fails to address the many problems actually inherent to our biological and social realities. Such an attitude inherently implies rejecting unpleasant facts, as well as fostering a general avoidance of the negative, an unwillingness to “feel bad”, and a crippling tendency of being unable to bear unpleasant objective experiences that must be endured in order to solve problems.

Objective critical evaluation is crucial to any sort of genuine integrity, and should synergize with the ideals of group advocacy, and the affirmation of individual preferences. These are both very important principles, neither should be neglected or blown out of proportion.

The issue with excessive reliance on tolerance is the spread of an insidious belief that all that is needed to have integrity is to be easygoing, sympathetic, and to proudly display one’s personal preferences.

Perhaps these may be admirable things, as the world definitely needs a reasonable degree of tolerance and self-expression. However, this social tendency has reached such extremes that it encourages insane levels of degeneracy. This tendency is also easily exploited by politicians and pundits, who use it to push aside many issues of profound importance.

There are some who believe themselves to be better and more enlightened than others, simply because they are more tolerant. This surface openness simply conceals a covert intolerance. Such individuals are secretly intolerant towards criticality, towards “no” itself! They affirm themselves and others, but are not willing to accept the need to reject, to forbid, to exclude, and to evaluate the world objectively.

We cannot simply discard that which we do not prefer, without examination, if we wish to have any legitimate understanding of the world. Nature is both nurturing and cruel, allowing personal preference to be expressed, while also balancing such preference with the objective realm of fact and necessity.

We must seek integrity within – a state of awareness that presents an unclouded mirror of Nature to our awareness – in order to truly solve the problems faced by our tribes, communities, nations, and the world itself.

The false integrity of superficial tolerance can only avoid difficult truths, because it would be too painful to address them directly. Likewise, being too critical, playing the “skeptic” (or the nihilist) is simply another trap, one that arises when one avoids subjective advocacy and places excessive reliance on objectivity.

For one to discover this integrity, one must come face to face with the shadow within, and embrace it.

Through this exploration of the hidden biases we hold, we can begin to perceive our “blind spots”, thereby achieving a greater state of wholeness, as well as a more encompassing awareness of the majesty and terror of existence itself.