Concerning Hyperborean Spirituality – Part 2

[Note: This article also contains modified contributions by beserkerguru & cairbethebard]

The hyperborean peoples have been said to be cursed with the “mark of Cain” because of their strong exploratory, conquering, and resistant natures. However, due to such tendencies, we are unique in being both willing and capable of both creating new systems when needed, and changing existing systems to adapt to new situations.

It is important to realize that spiritual aspirations and spiritual realization ARE compatible with political stances, aims and memetic activities. The fact is, integral thinking is not incompatible with both critical thinking and race realism. This delusion is part of the (((control structure))) that limits our people from realizing their potential.

False Dichotomies

We are supposedly limited to either/or propositions – being spiritual vs practical, worldly vs mystical. These are examples of false dichotomies.

False dichotomies are everywhere in the socio-political landscape, because they are useful tools to shape public opinion, sentiment and ultimately, group activity. They trap us in unnecessary quandaries without end.

The prevailing social narrative consists of a trap that presents us with a false dilemma. This paradigm forces individuals to choose between their innate tendencies of subjective preference, and those of objective analysis. This is framed as a struggle between the desire to relate, sympathize, and integrate, and the impulse to evaluate, judge, and restrict.

These principles are not mutually exclusive. We possess both of these inherent impulses, and both of these impulses are absolutely necessary to both our individual, tribal, and species survival. We are both are analyzers AND sympathizers, not either-or!

The contrast between preference and dislike is a fact of relative existence. Every person has things they prefer, and things they reject, as well as possessing relative strengths and weaknesses.

We cannot effectively employ one of these qualities without the other. If you focus only on that which you like, you become weak, negligent, hyper-accommodating: a “snowflake”. If you focus only on what you dislike, you become captious, hard, uncaring – the so-called “extremist”.

The illusory division between tolerance and criticalness artificially divides a single continuum of decision: that of memory. To rely on only one pole of this line is to lose integrity: the ability to discern what is beneficial as well as what is necessary, not just one or the other.

Relying solely on preference is dangerous. For example, any “subjective science”, that is, a science where preference is inserted into the scientific method, is doomed to fail. Letting such an ideology run wild can cause severe harm.

Likewise, any “objective” or “hard scientific” means of understanding inter-relationship, feelings/emotions and motives can never truly be comprehensive, because it lacks a crucial component: that of subjective affinity. This cannot be accounted for with mere statistics.

Reflection & Action

The fact is: ignoring the plight of our people is to neglect a both a material and a spiritual duty.

Activism must coexist with the quest for spiritual realization, because otherwise it can trend downwards into the negative, into divisivneness, negativity, and blackpilling.

Also, we must fuse real world action with online presence. This means that you must make active use of your understanding of the world situation whenever the opportunity presents itself.

This doesn’t mean being a fanatic. Neither mere ideology nor simple organization will work on their own, they must fit together. The means by which they will fit together and obtain supremacy is through conventionality – that is, through being widely accepted.

Oppositional tactics are not the only means to obtain the goals which we seek, although they may, at times, be required. Conceptual acceptance is a crucial medium.

As hyperborean philosophers, we must present an ideology that is explicitly NOT intended to mesh with existing philosophies. This is deliberate, in order to create a separate or “counter-current” to so called “judeo-christianity” and other milquetoast ideologies.

Christianity & Tradition

A traditional orientation fundamentally resists such upstarts as “new age” movements and atheism, viewing these beliefs as based in fantasy, not fact. Of course, it is important to point out that agnosticism is not atheism, because it does not assume total certainty, where atheism flatly rejects the Divine concept.

Christianity is certainly a traditional ideology, but its current expressions are clearly flawed, incomplete, and misguided, and are therefore its institutions are unable to cope with spiritual atrophy. The authorities in these circles often lack a deep spiritual understanding.

Christianity is essentially a group religion, where people gather to worship. Churches are both community nexii as well as nodes in the Christian network. This is a valuable resource, when it is vitiated with enthusiasm and inspiration.

However, due to the decay of this community, the Christian network has also withered. A side-effect of this is that the spirituality of the people of said communities was also negatively affected.

However, the existing Christian communities should not be discounted, for they contain many good, spiritually-oriented people, who recognize the decay of the religion at large.

Individual Seeking & Ethics

Many traditions encourage a personal (or apprenticeship-based) spirituality. Such individualist philosophies often lack a firm code of ethics, which is detrimental to their spread in a wider societal context.

It is important to have a strong-yet-flexible spiritual code of ethics. It is also crucial to provide imagery and ideology that speaks to the current rise of decadence, as well as recognizing God’s indifference to destruction when the people are likewise indifferent.

All spiritual systems and disciplines are relative analogs of one another. They all seek the transcendent Source. However, this Source already provides the means of fundamental orientation for the life of sentient beings, however cryptic its mandate may appear.

Any codified system is simply an externalization of the internal realization of its founders. Although all may discover the truth of spiritual essence, few in this age do so. The light in said systems often dies out when the successors are spiritually flawed or empty.

It is the duty of a spiritual warrior to preserve the integrity of spirituality, so that future generations may benefit, just as it is the duty of the artist to preserve the qualities of thought-provocation and beauty in culture.

This duty implies both a duty to one’s own integrity, as well as to serve the integrity of the community. For those with “conservative values”, these virtues are already an imperative, so a hyperborean spirituality seeks to support them with an uplifting and factual spiritual ideology.

The individual who discovers Truth, the essence of Natural Law and the knowledge of the Self, is much better equipped to resist degeneracy and corruption, while also actively participating in a positive brotherhood (or sisterhood).

The balance between the spiritual and physical levels of our experience allows for a culture to flourish.

The exploration of “inner space” is as important as action in the physical world. We must permit entheogenic exploration among those who are naturally equipped for such sojourning.

To cultivate a personal relationship with Spirit, and to engage it consciously, is to achieve a state of empowerment beyond the mundane. If society was structured with all of this in mind, the ability to subtly affect manifest existence for the benefit of our fellows would be substantially improved.

We need to learn to apply ourselves, how to spiritually preserve our environments and our people, and this transformation must begin with the individual. All power is vested in the individual, the incarnation (through fractal iteration) of Divinity on Earth.

An integral spirituality must have, in order to persist, a primarily individual foundation that is thereafter oriented towards the group, and only then extended to the collective.

Advertisements

And Beheld A White Horse

Upon Him Rode Death and Hell Followed With Him

Several days ago I had an experience on Twitter that was probably my greatest contribution to the movement so far, though outside of this article and the small circle who may catch onto what I am alluding to, this shall not be remembered by any of my descendants and that is perhaps the greatest triumph in it. I will not spend this article recounting the specifics, they are unimportant and you all have such experiences on a regular enough schedule that even dealt in generalizations, you shall understand the hand.

I engaged in an attempted debate with a self proclaimed irony bro who was in the process of kvetching about the hopelessness we face. I challenged this notion first, for we are on trajectory to consume disaffected white youth into our movement en masse. We are in a bad situation, we need not fool ourselves. However, we are white and when faced with such toils, our people have uniquely risen to the challenge. I dare suggest it is only when we are on the ropes will we be persuaded to fight.

Of course, this was lost upon my friend the irony bro of the black pill variety. He thought all effort was in vain and we should resign to our extinction. Such an attitude is toxic and unneeded in our struggles for even if it were so, which it hardly is so dire even now, we should not pass peacefully into the annuals of history but instead go out with the rage of the thousands of generations that came before you. I will empty the halls of Valhalla of our honored dead myself if necessary for mine is proud, hot blood and will accept nothing short of maximum effort at every juncture. I know the same holds true of you all or we would not still be here today. Our moment of weakness is preceded by centuries of strength.

“But what if we fail?” says he of little faith. May I remind you all the Roman Empire fell, as did the German Empire and yet people of white skin persist even these most humiliating of losses. Instead of hating one another and wrecking our societies over which flag Lorraine belongs beneath, we now are faced with deciding if we shall pass from this Earth with applause or persist despite our many set backs. We cannot be such craven creatures as our fathers and their fathers clearly were or there will be no crop of sons to take the mantle from us and continue on as we have since we first emerged from the caves to face a harsh and brutal world.

“Muh white baby” is a retort this individual used several times to protest the adverse reactions he had received for his ramblings and disrespectful behavior. Yes we need more white babies, but what makes us great is not the quantity of children produced but the quality. Anyone so unequipped as to black pill the vulnerable among our ranks to express internal dissatisfaction is not the optimal candidate to raise a white baby. Though it seems at this point inevitable, be sure to get yourself in good mental shape before embarking on the quest that is child rearing and be ready to devote yourself to it. If you find that you miss twitter as you are changing diapers then you must look inside to see what aspect of yourself you failed to address for your priorities should already be very clear.

We need not become black pilled by our set backs but instead we must overcome ourselves as the first step in the process to making ourselves worthy of our heritage. This means we have to silence voices that would pull us apart or subvert us by appealing to our sensitivities and drawing us into mania and cowardice. I am proud to see that more of us are willing to speak out against these whiny voices and demonstrate their own internal strength. We cannot expect this to be a fast process, nor will it be a smooth transition that seems matter of course. Nothing worthwhile is ever so simple to achieve and if it were we would live in the most boring of possible worlds.

It is said

Beating The Black Pill

There is a tendency, in these days of increased awareness when one has taken so many red pills, that one simply cannot be any more woke. Life then takes on a new hue – nothing is surprising, everything is predictable, and hope of any real change in our current state seems totally lost.

It is at this time that it begins to feel like all those red pills just add up to one big black pill. Stuck in your throat, it chokes your ability to express yourself in normie company without being called pessimistic, or finding yourself constantly accused of being in a dark mood.

Ive personally watched several heavily red pilled individuals get so black pilled that they cant get themselves back out of that miserable hole, and after a prolonged period in this state, another, more dangerous phase emerges. This is what we will call the “irony pill”, which shouldn’t be confused with the “iron pill”.

The iron pill demands white men pick themselves up and start to take life seriously in order to make a difference in the world, whereas, in stark opposition, the Irony pill essentially turns one into an irony bro, that is, everything becomes ironic. All the red pills reverse; race mixing becomes an imperative, white genocide an aim, and civilisation a joke. Id even go so far as to suspect that irony bros begin to experiment with homosexuality, if not becoming full blown homosexuals.

So what is the way out of this dead end, just as destructive as the blue pills endlessly forced on us from birth?

The solution I propose is for one to find some kind of creative outlet for your woke frustration, a form of escape that will allow you focus on something other than the incessant cultural programming. Paint, make films, music, or write a story, anything that takes you away from the day to day, and puts you in a much needed personal and imaginative space. The red pills have gone so deep anyway that you wont be able to avoid making something meaningful and rich in symbolism, both consciously and unconsciously.

There will always be Alt-Right podcasts, analysis, charts, parody songs, memes and infographics which concentrate heavily on the political side of things, but artistic expression can express these same ideas in a non-political setting, and is a valuable part of any movement, as well as a time-honoured, admirable tradition in the West. It may also go some way towards reaching other, more normie people, and helping them better understand and digest the things you are aware of, which is, afterall, what is more needed in our struggle than more gay ironybros.

One Does Not Simply Ask For One’s Freedom

The following passage is taken from pages 57-58 of Personality and Evolution, by Stan Gooch:

‘The Ego, ideally, bears its sufferings in silence and without complaint. Again, ideally, it does not break this silence even under torture. It does not request mercy. Nor does it request freedom – it simply takes it, or dies in the attempt. ‘Let my people go’ is the request of the Self. (And one must report, sadly, that those who merely ask for their freedom do not usually get it.)

There is, indeed, a sense in which the Self does not want to be free and in which it enjoys its suffering. This is a statement one must make with caution – for, though it is, I believe, in a certain sense true, it is the kind of statement which is apt to be only too useful as fascist propaganda. Is one saying, for example, that the Jews enjoyed the concentration camps of the last war? Or that Negroes wanted to be shipped as slaves to America and elsewhere, there often to die of starvation and mistreatment? That obviously goes much too far. Yet there is a sort of truth here. There is a joking question which asks : “What does a Jew fear more than persecution?” to which the answer is : “being overlooked.” And something of this is true, I think, also of women. Some women, at any rate, seem willing to accept a good deal of physical violence and other ill-treatment from the men they love. The wanting of punishment or suffering has in fact obtained clear recognition, not only in clinical psychology, but in common parlance, with the term ‘masochism’. A masochist is a person who, in some sense of the terms, enjoys suffering and invites pain.’

For the purpose of this essay I will be referring to Gooch’s theory on the human mind, which simply proposes that it is comprised of two systems, the Ego and the Self. In short the Ego can be roughly equated to a daytime, conscious, linear, masculine brain, located in the cerebrum and the musculature of the body, whilst the Self can be equated to a nocturnal, unconscious, irrational, feminine brain, located in the cerebellum, and the autonomic responses of the body – the reflexes, the senses, the viscera etc.

Some populations of the world are led more by the Self, and some by the Ego. But every one of us contains both at all times. It’s the essence of human. Across the world, where cerebellar activities such as ‘soul’ singing, dancing and the use of emotional feelings to describe one’s state are more popular, we can say these people, as a whole, are more driven by the Self. And where we find a greater propensity for cerebral activity, such as technical discussion or time-regulated tasks, as well as a sense of individuality, we will find people who are more Ego-dominant. Incidentally, on average, men are more ‘Ego’ focused and women more ‘Self’ focused.

Americans asking for their freedom

Getting back to our point, the notion of freedom, to an Ego dominant individual, is inherent in his personality. The very idea that another individual doesn’t have freedom is incredulous. How can you not have something that you were born with, he will say? How can you let someone (whom you have not contracted with) tell you what to do? For individual freedom is indeed a natural state for the Ego dominant personality. A Self dominant personality, on the other hand, is naturally submissive (lacking a dominant internal Ego), and so practically requires a master to give him the discipline required in an Ego dominant system, such as the West. If we apply Gooch’s theory to our world, then we begin to understand why some people just can’t be free.

Take the current situation in America for example (and to some extent across the Western world). Radical, separatist African-Americans, or at least their latest incarnation known as Black Lives Matter, are asking for the American establishment to give them the same privileges and freedoms apparently only allowed by white Americans. The question that no one seems to ask is why don’t they simply walk away from their oppressors and start their own country somewhere else? Isn’t this exactly what the white American people had to do in order to free themselves from their former master England? Break off all ties and never speak again, or at least until the dust had settled and they had found their own identity as a cohesive, separate nation. Of course, it wasn’t easy, but the end result was vastly more freedom than they had been previously ‘allowed’ by the English. They never complained during the hardest years, neither did they ask England to save them during events such as the great depression, they suffered their pain in silence rather than buckle under and crawl back in a submissive position.

Black people resisting

Black Lives Matter (along with many other ‘oppressed’ Self groups) talk about forming resistance (which is at least a step up from ‘assistance’). But resistance is exactly what they don’t need to be doing. Why would someone want to remain a part of a system that supposedly treats them with such abject disrespect, and always has? Resistance is the language of the willing victim, for it is only someone who wants to be accepted by the system who feels they have something to resist in it. They could apply their full force in resistance but eventually they will expend all their energy and the age-old system will still be there. If you wish to make yourself an enemy of the masters, who hold all the power, you will, inevitably, lose. The only way to negate the effect of the system is to totally remove oneself from it, and refuse to interact with it ever again. Of course, this would also mean no more special rights and privileges such as welfare, free schooling, access to jobs etc, but after a few years hard work they would be truly self-reliant, self-sufficient, and free.

The same argument can be applied to Israel, and the Jewish populations of the West. Historically, almost every Jewish population has claimed to have suffered oppression under their host nations. Even as far back as ancient Egypt we find Moses tasked with freeing his people from slavery (((which they had apparently been placed under for no reason))). The question is, if the West is so anti-Semitic, why don’t they simply move to their own country which they fought so hard for (and continue to fight for), and never have contact with the so-called evil Europeans again? Could it really be true that some people relish their place in society as the eternal victim, using it to milk assistance from the countries who are simultaneously accused of abusing them?

Is it then the fault of the ‘oppressive’ Ego-led, self-responsible Europeans, with their ‘one man’ mindset, or is it the fault of the ‘oppressed’ Self-obsessed peoples of the world, with their ‘one world’ mindset? In reality, it is no ones ‘fault’. It is simply a ‘fault’, or more correctly, a ‘feature’ in the genetic make up of each human race that is responsible for their actions and reactions. Only our recognition of this hard-wired precurser can prevent us from repeatedly making the same historic mistakes, over and over.

When Life Gives You Lemons, Detox.

‘It is said that we are born alkaline, and die acidic.’

Brown is the colour of stagnation. Where a river is free and wild its water is white, whereas, if it is brackish and stagnant, it is brown. When it rots, food goes brown, and when it passes out of the body, devoid of any goodness, it is also brown. In Iridology – the study of the eye for the purposes of determining the health of an individual – brown stains or spots in the eye signify stagnation within the body, through the build up of toxins in the organs. In general, mammals are born with blue eyes, and blue eyes are most definitely seen as a sign of purity, much to the chagrin of brown people.

It is generally agreed that in order to build a lasting and virtually indestructible ethnostate, we must first seek to remove the toxins that pollute our society. Society is a super-structure of the bodies within it, so if the bodies themselves are toxic, then the society will also be the same. Therefore, in order to detoxify our society, and our civilisation, we must first begin with the individuals within it. It may be a controversial idea, but on close inspection I think it quite adequately explains why less white, blue-eyed societies are more prone to stagnation, and ultimately, failure.

The lemon is our first step towards detoxification, and the reversal of the degeneration that leads to stagnation. 

Begin your day by squeezing one whole, organic lemon into a pint of fresh, filtered water. It will not only hydrate you, which has many benefits alone, but as lemon is acidic, it causes the body to create a more alkaline environment. This is the first battle ground on which our fight against the acidic, stagnant environment preventing the ethnostate from being realised will be fought. 

Acidosis, the increase of acidity within the body, is partly the result of our (((toxic environment))) and our (((modern lifestyle))). Lack of sleep, the consumption of too many acidic foods, and heavy metals in our atmosphere all lead to an increase in acid levels in the body, which creates inflammation. An acidic system causes the cells, and the body to degenerate. Inflammation and acidosis have been shown to play a major role in heart disease, stroke, cancer, and no end of common physical ailments.

Because the mind and body are connected, the increased alkalinity in the body will gradually lead to a clearer mind, which will encourage one to seek out more ways to detox, or decrease acidity within the body. Each stage of detoxification will create a more focused, cleaner mind and body, and combined with exercise one will be on the path to becoming a healthy cell within the corpus of society. And if each of us remove some of those toxins from within, we will see them being removed from without. This is how the ethnostate should be built if we wish it to last, and if we wish to bring down the zio-pharmaceutical, zio-chemical and zio-agricultural order once and for all.

At the end of the day, just before bed, fill another pint glass with filtered water and squeeze another lemon into it, so that your body is alkalised during sleep, which is the most important part of the day, as this is when your body is able to start repairing cellular damage.

As I am currently investigating and partaking in this topic, I will be discussing the next stages of detox over time, but to begin with two lemons a day is a very simple and effective way to work towards building a healthy ethnostate, from the roots up.

On Defectors

With every movement, it is inevitable that there will be defectors and detractors. Whether that’s someone genuinely changing their minds or an infiltrator pretending to have a change of heart, it has to be something we handle in a healthy manner. We can’t force anyone to believe anything, so the primary focus should be on how we respond to these situations.
A balance must be met. We cannot just ignore people leaving our ranks, but we cannot make it out to be a bigger deal than it actually is. When it comes down to it, most people are entirely replaceable. The movement is not hinging on any one person, and acting like it does gives them too much credit.
In my opinion, such actions should be met with clear, calm denunciation, and then ignored. If they aren’t fighting for us or explicitly against us at that point it’s a waste of time, energy, and concentration to continue focusing on them. However, we should have responses to any criticisms they rose ready, because the left will assuredly use those arguments against us.

I think that Eli Mosley made some good points in regards to this, there’s a full thread:

I’d like to address the people who backed out of the movement post-cville and the ones who stood strong. People like @bakedalaska & others:

— Eli Mosley (@ThatEliMosley) September 12, 2017

He is 100% right. None of us are ever going to be able to unlearn the things we have. Those that fall away either never believed it in the first place, or they are in denial to themselves. I for one, will not live a life like that.
To those of us deeply involved in the movement, this isn’t just some game. If you’re thinking of “joining the alt-right” just because it’s trendy or edgy, don’t. There are many sacrifices that you will have to make if you do, and you will only walk away with a tarnished reputation if you decide to leave. I wish that it weren’t like this, but that’s how things work now.

An Honest Look at the Alt-Right

If you are like many people, in America and around the globe, you believe that there is a negative aura around the so called, “Alt-Right”. You may believe we are all in the Ku Klux Klan, evil racists, or Neo-Nazis. The media will show you the images of those men in wizard robes and the ones carrying a Nazi flag. However, you are seeing 0.1% of the Alt-Right. I will come right out and say it, I, along with a majority of the Alt-Right, disapprove of these people. I not only see them as somewhat dumb, but also destructive. They know what they are doing is hurting public image and they continue to do it. Racism and hate are not what we are about at all. In fact, quite the opposite is true.

The Alt-Right is not about hating other races or anything along those lines. To me it is about recognizing that all races are different. It is to acknowledge that race is a real thing that differentiates different peoples. The Alt-Right is simply an advocate for the white race. Just as the Hotep movement and the NAACP is for the black race, UnidosUS is for Latinos, and yes… Zionism is for the Jews. If you look at all these groups I just mentioned, it can be assumed that there are a minority of people in those groups that may be extreme and evil, right? The same goes for the Alt-Right.

I’m hoping this isn’t hard for some to believe, but I am, in fact, just a normal guy. I’m a senior in high school, I have a lot of friends and I’m involved in various school positivity clubs. My friends are very diverse in ideas, and I, indeed, have a few friends who aren’t white. I don’t hold it against them that their opinions differ from mine, or let it take away from the fact that they are good people at heart. Even if we argue or debate topics, that doesn’t mean I hate them. This is important on all levels of social interaction. Open debate and the welcoming of diverse ideas is one of the founding principles of the United States. Just because my ideology may not fit into the normal realm of US politics, doesn’t mean that my group shouldn’t have a platform to speak our minds, without fear of backlash.

Now, what might separate the ideas of myself and the ideas of other advocacy groups? We believe that to preserve this beautiful diverse culture that everyone has, we keep them somewhat removed from each other. Now the magnitude on this is debatable, whether it is separating by cultural communities, balkanized states, or separate countries all together. I know this is not the pro-multiculutural society that we live in today, but in my personal opinion, it can decrease a lot of tension between groups of people. This tribalistic tendency is only natural. Rather than forcing different races to intermingle and fight, why not let nature sort it out?

If anyone reading this can take anything from this article, it is this. The Alt-Right recognizes a difference in race. This being said, our goal is to advocate and preserve our race. Though our individual ideas may differ on how to do this, our goal is the same. If we are not able to complete this goal, it may mean the eventual destruction of the White race. I’m hoping that I was able to shine some light on our ideas and show that we aren’t as far fetched as people make us out to be.  Rather than automatically berating and hating us, next time, hear us out. Instead of beating each other senseless in the street, maybe we could have a real discussion.

 

If anyone has any questions or comments on the article, the best way to reach me is on twitter @MacTonight_