cairbethebard

The Race Question

The Race Question was a report put out by UNESCO in 1950 to decide once and for all whether man was one species, or many sub-species. Of course the result was a foregone conclusion, as UNESCO were dedicated to combating ‘racism’, and (((Post-war Socialism))) – preached by the remaining cowardly intelligentsia who had managed to hide from the bloody and protracted fighting of the Second World War – would put forward the idea that all differences in the races were a result of purely environmental factors, such as economics, geographical location and cultural norms.

With this big idea, they would attempt to erase any sense of belonging or heritage in the races of men, and reduce them to amnesic wanderers with no history, no borders and no national allegiances. This misguided social engineering experiment would instead lead to the very dangerous place we are in currently, where Europeans – whose wicked ‘nature’ is apparently exempt from the environmental argument of sociologists – are being blamed for every problem in the world, and no other race can take responsibility for their own actions. Corporations are exploiting this plot hole as a way to enslave us all in what is fast becoming a totalitarian Global Socialist world.

By way of supporting this argument, I’ll take a look at some of the noted authors of this report, as I think they each merit a brief mention for their own interests. The full report can be found here.

The main rapporteur, or appointed investigator, of the report was Montague Francis Ashley-Montagu. Montagu was born in London as Israel Ehrenberg, and studied at the London School of Economics, where he became one of the first students of Bronisław Malinowski, who was an influential social anthropologist.

Juan Comas was a Communist Spanish Republican exiled during the time of Franco, who wrote many titles on social anthropology. He was also a recipient of the Bronislaw Malinowski award in 1978.

Luiz de Aguiar Costa Pinto was a Brazilian sociologist who specialized in race relations in Brazil. Brazil had long held to the idea that racial integration and mixing was the way forward. Particularly in São Paulo, the dominant idea was that national workers were unable to develop the country, and that only foreign workers would be able to work in a regime of “free” (i.e., wage) labour. The goal was to “whiten” Brazil through new immigrants and through future miscegenation in which former slaves would disappear by becoming “whiter”.

Edward Franklin Frazier was an American sociologist and author. A successful graduate of the then segregated US school system, his 1932 Ph.D. dissertation was published as a book titled The Negro Family in the United States (1939); it analyzed the historical forces that influenced the development of the African-American family from the time of slavery to the mid-1930s. The book was awarded the 1940 Anisfield-Wolf Book Award for the most significant work in the field of race relations. It was among the first sociological works on blacks researched and written by a black person.

Morris Ginsberg was a British sociologist, who played a key role in the development of the discipline. A Talmudic scholar, he later found his way into the London School of Economics, working under the professor Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse. Hobhouse was a leading internationalist of his day and an early proponent of Social Liberalism.

Claude Lévi-Strauss was one of the founders of ethnology and leading theorist of structural anthropology. He was born to French Jewish parents in Brussels, and during WW1 lived in Paris with his maternal grandfather, who was the rabbi of the synagogue of Versailles. He also stayed for some time in Brazil, where he served as a visiting professor of sociology at the University of São Paulo. Later, during WW2, he moved to New York, whilst his former wife stayed to work with the French resistance.

The report was revised by Ashley Montagu following criticisms submitted by various ‘great minds’ of the day, some of whom are listed below:

Hadley Cantril, a researcher of public opinion, and the main author of The Invasion from Mars, an academic study of Orson Welles’s 1938 radio broadcast of The War of the Worlds, which caused widespread panic.

Dr. Gunnar Dahlberg, a Swedish physician, eugenist and geneticist, and one of the signatories of the ‘Eugenics Manifesto’, a manifesto published in the journal Nature in 1939, titled Social Biology and Population Improvement.

Theodosius Grygorovych Dobzhansky, a prominent Ukrainian-American geneticist, evolutionary biologist and fellow signatory of the aforementioned ‘Eugenics Manifesto’.

Julian Huxley, whose name precedes him, was the first director of UNESCO, a founding member of the World Wildlife Fund and the first President of the British Humanist Association, as well as a eugenicist, and internationalist. He was also a signatory of the ‘Eugenics Manifesto’.

Otto Klineberg, who was a Canadian psychologist. His work in the 1930s on the intelligence of white and black students in the United States and his evidence as an expert witness in Delaware were instrumental in winning the Supreme Court school segregation case Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.

Herman Joseph Muller, an American geneticist and educator, who amongst other things loved the USSR and helped edit and distribute an illegal leftist student newspaper in the USA, The Spark.

Karl Gunnar Myrdal, a Swedish economist, sociologist, and politician. In 1974, he received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences with Friedrich Hayek for “their pioneering work in the theory of money and economic fluctuations and for their penetrating analysis of the interdependence of economic, social and institutional phenomena.” He is best known in the United States for his study of race relations, which culminated in his book An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. The study was influential in the 1954 landmark U.S. Supreme Court Decision Brown v. Board of Education. He was also presented with the Bronislaw Malinowski Award in 1975.

Curt Jacob Stern, a Jewish German, whose teaching and 1949 textbook were instrumental in re-founding human genetics on a non-racist basis.

I will leave you with the closing paragraph of the report, which reads like an SJW manifesto:

‘biological studies lend support to the ethic of universal brotherhood; for man is born with drives toward co-operation, and unless these drives are satisfied, men and nations alike fall ill. Man is born a social being who can reach his fullest development only through interaction with his fellows. The denial at any point of this social bond between man and man brings with it disintegration. In this sense, every man is his brother’s keeper. For every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main, because he is involved in mankind.’

taken from –

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashley_Montagu

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronisław_Malinowski

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Comas

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luiz_de_Aguiar_Costa_Pinto

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Franklin_Frazier

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_Ginsberg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Hobhouse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Lévi-Strauss

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadley_Cantril

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunnar_Dahlberg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodosius_Dobzhansky

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Huxley

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Klineberg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Joseph_Muller

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunnar_Myrdal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curt_Stern

Memes and the Post-Riot Age

At the turn of the century a new form of media rose that virtually obsoleted the dominant media form which had a stranglehold over information for the past 100 years. News print, television and film have all suffered with the rise of the internet, and rightly so, as their deadly machines have been increasingly co-opted to serve a corrupted establishment, and their subversive and destructive agenda.
The internet has provided the world, particularly the Western world, with a new form of protest – the meme. Originally conceived by Richard Dawkins in his seminal work ‘The Selfish Gene’, a meme is the cultural equivalent of a gene (its similarity in name is no coincidence). Whereas genes are information passed down genetically from generation to generation, memes are information passed down through cultural means. The old joke “an Englishman, in Irishman and a Scotsman..” is a meme in that the same joke will be told in Iran as “an Iranian, an Iraqi and an Israeli…”. the framework which exists underneath the outer dressing is the meme.

As the internet has grown certain figures, images or icons have been used again and again to express a similar idea, universally understood by users. One such meme is Pepe the frog, who recently rose to prominence with the Donald Trump campaign. Many Trump supporters took control of the Pepe meme, which has existed on the internet for at least a decade, and used it as a form of protest against their enemies, to great effect.

In the 21st century protests, marches and their inevitable outcome, the riot, are now the reserve of angry, impulsive minority groups, which gives them the unconscious appearance in the European psyche of being course, rash, or crude forms of political or social expression. The meme has become a vastly superior sophisticated form of protest or psychological warfare to Europeans. The blatant lack of ability to understand and use memes by minority groups is painfully obvious.

There are many in the European struggle who puzzle at the apparent apathy of their people to enact a response to the current situation, and it may seem that this lack of interest amounts to their certain death, at the hands of more energetic groups. Europeans have been through everything at least twice, their racial memory – always picking up subtle cues from the environment – is well aware of the amount of energy one expends when organising protests and marches and the such, and the relative futility of them in the face of the enemy. Europeans have become more nuanced in their behaviour and less physically obvious in their response to situations in which they are threatened. Once they had crusades and decades long wars, then revolutions, civil wars, pogroms, and short, large-scale ground offensives – each time becoming faster and more precise in the execution of the solution to the problem at hand. Europeans have faced their enemy many times before, and to respond the same way each time would be madness.

Europeans play politics like chess, reserve ones energy for the time when it will be most needed, and then, in as few decisive moves as possible, change the game. There is no longer any sense in bursts of energy, as these deplete vital stores and leave one unable to fully push back when needed. Instead, they suffer the spears and arrows, the constant insults and disrespect, the denigration and dismissal of their culture and the destruction of their civilisation, because they know deep down inside when the time is right they will strike back, and it will be devastating.

Beating The Black Pill

There is a tendency, in these days of increased awareness when one has taken so many red pills, that one simply cannot be any more woke. Life then takes on a new hue – nothing is surprising, everything is predictable, and hope of any real change in our current state seems totally lost.

It is at this time that it begins to feel like all those red pills just add up to one big black pill. Stuck in your throat, it chokes your ability to express yourself in normie company without being called pessimistic, or finding yourself constantly accused of being in a dark mood.

Ive personally watched several heavily red pilled individuals get so black pilled that they cant get themselves back out of that miserable hole, and after a prolonged period in this state, another, more dangerous phase emerges. This is what we will call the “irony pill”, which shouldn’t be confused with the “iron pill”.

The iron pill demands white men pick themselves up and start to take life seriously in order to make a difference in the world, whereas, in stark opposition, the Irony pill essentially turns one into an irony bro, that is, everything becomes ironic. All the red pills reverse; race mixing becomes an imperative, white genocide an aim, and civilisation a joke. Id even go so far as to suspect that irony bros begin to experiment with homosexuality, if not becoming full blown homosexuals.

So what is the way out of this dead end, just as destructive as the blue pills endlessly forced on us from birth?

The solution I propose is for one to find some kind of creative outlet for your woke frustration, a form of escape that will allow you focus on something other than the incessant cultural programming. Paint, make films, music, or write a story, anything that takes you away from the day to day, and puts you in a much needed personal and imaginative space. The red pills have gone so deep anyway that you wont be able to avoid making something meaningful and rich in symbolism, both consciously and unconsciously.

There will always be Alt-Right podcasts, analysis, charts, parody songs, memes and infographics which concentrate heavily on the political side of things, but artistic expression can express these same ideas in a non-political setting, and is a valuable part of any movement, as well as a time-honoured, admirable tradition in the West. It may also go some way towards reaching other, more normie people, and helping them better understand and digest the things you are aware of, which is, afterall, what is more needed in our struggle than more gay ironybros.

One Does Not Simply Ask For One’s Freedom

The following passage is taken from pages 57-58 of Personality and Evolution, by Stan Gooch:

‘The Ego, ideally, bears its sufferings in silence and without complaint. Again, ideally, it does not break this silence even under torture. It does not request mercy. Nor does it request freedom – it simply takes it, or dies in the attempt. ‘Let my people go’ is the request of the Self. (And one must report, sadly, that those who merely ask for their freedom do not usually get it.)

There is, indeed, a sense in which the Self does not want to be free and in which it enjoys its suffering. This is a statement one must make with caution – for, though it is, I believe, in a certain sense true, it is the kind of statement which is apt to be only too useful as fascist propaganda. Is one saying, for example, that the Jews enjoyed the concentration camps of the last war? Or that Negroes wanted to be shipped as slaves to America and elsewhere, there often to die of starvation and mistreatment? That obviously goes much too far. Yet there is a sort of truth here. There is a joking question which asks : “What does a Jew fear more than persecution?” to which the answer is : “being overlooked.” And something of this is true, I think, also of women. Some women, at any rate, seem willing to accept a good deal of physical violence and other ill-treatment from the men they love. The wanting of punishment or suffering has in fact obtained clear recognition, not only in clinical psychology, but in common parlance, with the term ‘masochism’. A masochist is a person who, in some sense of the terms, enjoys suffering and invites pain.’

For the purpose of this essay I will be referring to Gooch’s theory on the human mind, which simply proposes that it is comprised of two systems, the Ego and the Self. In short the Ego can be roughly equated to a daytime, conscious, linear, masculine brain, located in the cerebrum and the musculature of the body, whilst the Self can be equated to a nocturnal, unconscious, irrational, feminine brain, located in the cerebellum, and the autonomic responses of the body – the reflexes, the senses, the viscera etc.

Some populations of the world are led more by the Self, and some by the Ego. But every one of us contains both at all times. It’s the essence of human. Across the world, where cerebellar activities such as ‘soul’ singing, dancing and the use of emotional feelings to describe one’s state are more popular, we can say these people, as a whole, are more driven by the Self. And where we find a greater propensity for cerebral activity, such as technical discussion or time-regulated tasks, as well as a sense of individuality, we will find people who are more Ego-dominant. Incidentally, on average, men are more ‘Ego’ focused and women more ‘Self’ focused.

Getting back to our point, the notion of freedom, to an Ego dominant individual, is inherent in his personality. The very idea that another individual doesn’t have freedom is incredulous. How can you not have something that you were born with, he will say? How can you let someone (whom you have not contracted with) tell you what to do? For individual freedom is indeed a natural state for the Ego dominant personality. A Self dominant personality, on the other hand, is naturally submissive (lacking a dominant internal Ego), and so practically requires a master to give him the discipline required in an Ego dominant system, such as the West. If we apply Gooch’s theory to our world, then we begin to understand why some people just can’t be free.

Take the current situation in America for example (and to some extent across the Western world). Radical, separatist African-Americans, or at least their latest incarnation known as Black Lives Matter, are asking for the American establishment to give them the same privileges and freedoms apparently only allowed by white Americans. The question that no one seems to ask is why don’t they simply walk away from their oppressors and start their own country somewhere else? Isn’t this exactly what the white American people had to do in order to free themselves from their former master England? Break off all ties and never speak again, or at least until the dust had settled and they had found their own identity as a cohesive, separate nation. Of course, it wasn’t easy, but the end result was vastly more freedom than they had been previously ‘allowed’ by the English. They never complained during the hardest years, neither did they ask England to save them during events such as the great depression, they suffered their pain in silence rather than buckle under and crawl back in a submissive position.

Black Lives Matter (along with many other ‘oppressed’ Self groups) talk about forming resistance (which is at least a step up from ‘assistance’). But resistance is exactly what they don’t need to be doing. Why would someone want to remain a part of a system that supposedly treats them with such abject disrespect, and always has? Resistance is the language of the willing victim, for it is only someone who wants to be accepted by the system who feels they have something to resist in it. They could apply their full force in resistance but eventually they will expend all their energy and the age-old system will still be there. If you wish to make yourself an enemy of the masters, who hold all the power, you will, inevitably, lose. The only way to negate the effect of the system is to totally remove oneself from it, and refuse to interact with it ever again. Of course, this would also mean no more special rights and privileges such as welfare, free schooling, access to jobs etc, but after a few years hard work they would be truly self-reliant, self-sufficient, and free.

The same argument can be applied to Israel, and the Jewish populations of the West. Historically, almost every Jewish population has claimed to have suffered oppression under their host nations. Even as far back as ancient Egypt we find Moses tasked with freeing his people from slavery (((which they had apparently been placed under for no reason))). The question is, if the West is so anti-Semitic, why don’t they simply move to their own country which they fought so hard for (and continue to fight for), and never have contact with the so-called evil Europeans again? Could it really be true that some people relish their place in society as the eternal victim, using it to milk assistance from the countries who are simultaneously accused of abusing them?

Is it then the fault of the ‘oppressive’ Ego-led, self-responsible Europeans, with their ‘one man’ mindset, or is it the fault of the ‘oppressed’ Self-obsessed peoples of the world, with their ‘one world’ mindset? In reality, it is no ones ‘fault’. It is simply a ‘fault’, or more correctly, a ‘feature’ in the genetic make up of each human race that is responsible for their actions and reactions. Only our recognition of this hard-wired precurser can prevent us from repeatedly making the same historic mistakes, over and over.

When Life Gives You Lemons, Detox.

‘It is said that we are born alkaline, and die acidic.’

Brown is the colour of stagnation. Where a river is free and wild its water is white, whereas, if it is brackish and stagnant, it is brown. When it rots, food goes brown, and when it passes out of the body, devoid of any goodness, it is also brown. In Iridology – the study of the eye for the purposes of determining the health of an individual – brown stains or spots in the eye signify stagnation within the body, through the build up of toxins in the organs. In general, mammals are born with blue eyes, and blue eyes are most definitely seen as a sign of purity, much to the chagrin of brown people.

It is generally agreed that in order to build a lasting and virtually indestructible ethnostate, we must first seek to remove the toxins that pollute our society. Society is a super-structure of the bodies within it, so if the bodies themselves are toxic, then the society will also be the same. Therefore, in order to detoxify our society, and our civilisation, we must first begin with the individuals within it. It may be a controversial idea, but on close inspection I think it quite adequately explains why less white, blue-eyed societies are more prone to stagnation, and ultimately, failure.

The lemon is our first step towards detoxification, and the reversal of the degeneration that leads to stagnation.

Begin your day by squeezing one whole, organic lemon into a pint of fresh, filtered water. It will not only hydrate you, which has many benefits alone, but as lemon is acidic, it causes the body to create a more alkaline environment. This is the first battle ground on which our fight against the acidic, stagnant environment preventing the ethnostate from being realised will be fought.

Acidosis, the increase of acidity within the body, is partly the result of our (((toxic environment))) and our (((modern lifestyle))). Lack of sleep, the consumption of too many acidic foods, and heavy metals in our atmosphere all lead to an increase in acid levels in the body, which creates inflammation. An acidic system causes the cells, and the body to degenerate. Inflammation and acidosis have been shown to play a major role in heart disease, stroke, cancer, and no end of common physical ailments.

Because the mind and body are connected, the increased alkalinity in the body will gradually lead to a clearer mind, which will encourage one to seek out more ways to detox, or decrease acidity within the body. Each stage of detoxification will create a more focused, cleaner mind and body, and combined with exercise one will be on the path to becoming a healthy cell within the corpus of society. And if each of us remove some of those toxins from within, we will see them being removed from without. This is how the ethnostate should be built if we wish it to last, and if we wish to bring down the zio-pharmaceutical, zio-chemical and zio-agricultural order once and for all.

At the end of the day, just before bed, fill another pint glass with filtered water and squeeze another lemon into it, so that your body is alkalised during sleep, which is the most important part of the day, as this is when your body is able to start repairing cellular damage.

As I am currently investigating and partaking in this topic, I will be discussing the next stages of detox over time, but to begin with two lemons a day is a very simple and effective way to work towards building a healthy ethnostate, from the roots up.

Contributions to Western Civilisation

The map above is largely based on observations of the American project, but also of the Europeans in their homelands, both presently and historically.

The majority of achievement levels unlocked in North America are by northern Europeans, specifically the English and Scottish races. These include the first colonies, the subsequent settlement of white lands, the constitution, and the establishment of major cities. Many of the presidents, secretaries and leading thinkers were or are whom are termed WASPs, white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants.
The next group of predominantly northern European peoples to have made a huge contribution to the advancement of white people in America, and also Europe, are the northern French, western Germanic and southern Scandinavian people, the Teutonic tribes. They were able to take the English inventions and ideas and ruthlessly perfect them, until farming, weaponry, medicine and industry were able to be rolled out on such a massive scale as to support the growing population of America. From the early agricultural developments, to the rocketry that took whitey to the moon, the Teutons have an autistic attention to detail when it comes to administration, and the perfection of technology.

These groups arrived early to the party, that is, they were involved in the establishment of civilization on the continent. Both the French and the Spanish races also played a part in this early venture, but being Catholic their role was largely antagonistic towards the northern European Protestants. Eventually, the Catholics all but gave up, the Spanish fell away towards the south and the French headed north.

The next group to enter north America, after the majority of the hard work had been done, were those from the far west, south, north and east of Europe. These immigrants were mainly poor, and brought with them the trappings of their lifestyle – crime, alcohol and carbohydrate rich food. The mafias that subsequently spread across America were, and are still made up of, the Irish, Mediterranean and Slavic races, each of whom’s traditional foods make up the bulk of the modern american cook book. Another huge contribution from particularly the Irish race was American folk music. It was even the Irish who gave the Africans the guitar, which spawned the blues music and eventually rap. Depressing sentimentality will be familiar to anyone who knows Irish folk music.

One could argue that the Greeks and the Italians made massive contributions to western civilisation, and therefore to the American project, but one could also argue that apart from a brief spell of excellence, neither managed a consistency any longer than a few centuries. One should also point out that the history of the Britons tells the story that the people who populated that fortunate island were the survivors of the Trojan war, who left that region and founded Rome and then went onto Great Britain. So the genetic stock of the Greeks and the Italians was the ancient Britons. This adequately explains the situation we find regarding the temporary excellence of the Greeks and Romans.

So there we have it. More proof that race is very real and its traces can be seen not just in Europe, but in project America. If each of the groups clearly outlined above could play to their strengths and not try to enviously block the efforts of the other, some sort of ethnic cohesion could be reached within the continent, allowing the American to naturally flourish.

Antique Social Justice

If you ever doubted that Uncle Adolph was anything other than the last great White prophet, then you haven’t read Mein Kampf.

Written in 1925, his incredible observation skills about the group that he called the Social Democrats, but who we in the current year know as Social Justice Warriors, only goes to show that the enemy we face today, is not a modern phenomenon, but an ancient adversary to our people, an energetic force not subject to the laws of time and space, but the laws of nature.

From page 56, ‘I understood the mental terror which this movement exercised on the population which could neither morally nor psychically resist such attacks. Social Democracy, at a given signal, directs a bombardment of lies… They persist in their proselyting efforts and calumnies towards the adversary who seemed most dangerous, till finally the nerves of those who had been attacked give out and they, for the sake of peace, bow down to the hated enemy.

But the fools will not find peace after all. The play begins again and is so often repeated till the fear of the mad dog paralyzes them by suggestion. As Social Democracy knows, from its own experience, the value of strength, it assaults mostly those in whom it scents a trace of that rare material. On the other hand, it praises every weakling of the other side, sometimes cautiously, sometimes more boldly, according to the mental qualities they appreciate or suspect. It is less afraid of a powerless, irresolute genius than of a strong man of even moderate intelligence. Most of all it recommends those who are weaklings in mind and power. It knows how to create the appearance as though this were the only way in which peace could be maintained; yet relentlessly it conquers one position after another…’

Consider the case of someone such as Tim Hunt, the genetic scientist who bowed apologetically to the pressure exerted upon him by this force, and lost everything. Apologies will neve appease this energy, it feeds from the weakness unconsciously displayed in a submittal.

From page 58, ‘These tactics are based on an exact calculation of all human weaknesses; their result must lead to success with almost mathematical certainty, unless the other side also learns to fight poison gas with poison gas. Weak natures have to be told that it simply means ‘to be or not to be’… The importance of physical terror against the individual and the masses also became clear to me. Here, too, we find exact calculation of the psychological effect. The terror in the workshops, in the factory, in the assembly hall, and on occasion of mass demonstrations will always be accompanied by success as long as it is not met by an equally great force of terror. Then, of course, the party will cry havoc; scornful of State authority it will now call for it, so that in most cases and in the general disorder, it will reach the goal that is, it will find some idiot of a higher official who, in the stupid hope of in this way gaining, for the future, perhaps the favor of the dreaded enemy, helps to break the adversary of this universal plague.’

Later in the book, he goes on to exclaim “imagine mein shock” when he realises that much like today, the leaders of the Social Democrats are also largely drawn from a non-European group of people, who will go on to take centre stage in the post-war demonization of our prophet.

Woke af, woke AH.