​The Race Question

The Race Question was a report put out by UNESCO in 1950 to decide once and for all whether man was one species, or many sub-species. Of course the result was a foregone conclusion, as UNESCO were dedicated to combating ‘racism’, and (((Post-war Socialism))) – preached by the remaining cowardly intelligentsia who had managed to hide from the bloody and protracted fighting of the Second World War – would put forward the idea that all differences in the races were a result of purely environmental factors, such as economics, geographical location and cultural norms.

With this big idea, they would attempt to erase any sense of belonging or heritage in the races of men, and reduce them to amnesic wanderers with no history, no borders and no national allegiances. This misguided social engineering experiment would instead lead to the very dangerous place we are in currently, where Europeans – whose wicked ‘nature’ is apparently exempt from the environmental argument of sociologists – are being blamed for every problem in the world, and no other race can take responsibility for their own actions. Corporations are exploiting this plot hole as a way to enslave us all in what is fast becoming a totalitarian Global Socialist world.

By way of supporting this argument, I’ll take a look at some of the noted authors of this report, as I think they each merit a brief mention for their own interests. The full report can be found here.

The main rapporteur, or appointed investigator, of the report was Montague Francis Ashley-Montagu. Montagu was born in London as Israel Ehrenberg, and studied at the London School of Economics, where he became one of the first students of Bronisław Malinowski, who was an influential social anthropologist.

Juan Comas was a Communist Spanish Republican exiled during the time of Franco, who wrote many titles on social anthropology. He was also a recipient of the Bronislaw Malinowski award in 1978.

Luiz de Aguiar Costa Pinto was a Brazilian sociologist who specialized in race relations in Brazil. Brazil had long held to the idea that racial integration and mixing was the way forward. Particularly in São Paulo, the dominant idea was that national workers were unable to develop the country, and that only foreign workers would be able to work in a regime of “free” (i.e., wage) labour. The goal was to “whiten” Brazil through new immigrants and through future miscegenation in which former slaves would disappear by becoming “whiter”.

Edward Franklin Frazier was an American sociologist and author. A successful graduate of the then segregated US school system, his 1932 Ph.D. dissertation was published as a book titled The Negro Family in the United States (1939); it analyzed the historical forces that influenced the development of the African-American family from the time of slavery to the mid-1930s. The book was awarded the 1940 Anisfield-Wolf Book Award for the most significant work in the field of race relations. It was among the first sociological works on blacks researched and written by a black person.

Morris Ginsberg was a British sociologist, who played a key role in the development of the discipline. A Talmudic scholar, he later found his way into the London School of Economics, working under the professor Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse. Hobhouse was a leading internationalist of his day and an early proponent of Social Liberalism.

Claude Lévi-Strauss was one of the founders of ethnology and leading theorist of structural anthropology. He was born to French Jewish parents in Brussels, and during WW1 lived in Paris with his maternal grandfather, who was the rabbi of the synagogue of Versailles. He also stayed for some time in Brazil, where he served as a visiting professor of sociology at the University of São Paulo. Later, during WW2, he moved to New York, whilst his former wife stayed to work with the French resistance.

The report was revised by Ashley Montagu following criticisms submitted by various ‘great minds’ of the day, some of whom are listed below:

Hadley Cantril, a researcher of public opinion, and the main author of The Invasion from Mars, an academic study of Orson Welles’s 1938 radio broadcast of The War of the Worlds, which caused widespread panic.

Dr. Gunnar Dahlberg, a Swedish physician, eugenist and geneticist, and one of the signatories of the ‘Eugenics Manifesto’, a manifesto published in the journal Nature in 1939, titled Social Biology and Population Improvement.

Theodosius Grygorovych Dobzhansky, a prominent Ukrainian-American geneticist, evolutionary biologist and fellow signatory of the aforementioned ‘Eugenics Manifesto’.

Julian Huxley, whose name precedes him, was the first director of UNESCO, a founding member of the World Wildlife Fund and the first President of the British Humanist Association, as well as a eugenicist, and internationalist. He was also a signatory of the ‘Eugenics Manifesto’.

Otto Klineberg, who was a Canadian psychologist. His work in the 1930s on the intelligence of white and black students in the United States and his evidence as an expert witness in Delaware were instrumental in winning the Supreme Court school segregation case Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.

Herman Joseph Muller, an American geneticist and educator, who amongst other things loved the USSR and helped edit and distribute an illegal leftist student newspaper in the USA, The Spark.

Karl Gunnar Myrdal, a Swedish economist, sociologist, and politician. In 1974, he received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences with Friedrich Hayek for “their pioneering work in the theory of money and economic fluctuations and for their penetrating analysis of the interdependence of economic, social and institutional phenomena.” He is best known in the United States for his study of race relations, which culminated in his book An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. The study was influential in the 1954 landmark U.S. Supreme Court Decision Brown v. Board of Education. He was also presented with the Bronislaw Malinowski Award in 1975.

Curt Jacob Stern, a Jewish German, whose teaching and 1949 textbook were instrumental in re-founding human genetics on a non-racist basis.

I will leave you with the closing paragraph of the report, which reads like an SJW manifesto:

‘biological studies lend support to the ethic of universal brotherhood; for man is born with drives toward co-operation, and unless these drives are satisfied, men and nations alike fall ill. Man is born a social being who can reach his fullest development only through interaction with his fellows. The denial at any point of this social bond between man and man brings with it disintegration. In this sense, every man is his brother’s keeper. For every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main, because he is involved in mankind.’

taken from –

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashley_Montagu

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronisław_Malinowski

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Comas

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luiz_de_Aguiar_Costa_Pinto

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Franklin_Frazier

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_Ginsberg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Hobhouse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Lévi-Strauss

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadley_Cantril

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunnar_Dahlberg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodosius_Dobzhansky

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Huxley

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Klineberg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Joseph_Muller

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunnar_Myrdal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curt_Stern

Advertisements

​Memes and the Post-Riot Age

At the turn of the century a new form of media rose that virtually obsoleted the dominant media form which had a stranglehold over information for the past 100 years. News print, television and film have all suffered with the rise of the internet, and rightly so, as their deadly machines have been increasingly co-opted to serve a corrupted establishment, and their subversive and destructive agenda.
The internet has provided the world, particularly the Western world, with a new form of protest – the meme. Originally conceived by Richard Dawkins in his seminal work ‘The Selfish Gene’, a meme is the cultural equivalent of a gene (its similarity in name is no coincidence). Whereas genes are information passed down genetically from generation to generation, memes are information passed down through cultural means. The old joke “an Englishman, in Irishman and a Scotsman..” is a meme in that the same joke will be told in Iran as “an Iranian, an Iraqi and an Israeli…”. the framework which exists underneath the outer dressing is the meme.

As the internet has grown certain figures, images or icons have been used again and again to express a similar idea, universally understood by users. One such meme is Pepe the frog, who recently rose to prominence with the Donald Trump campaign. Many Trump supporters took control of the Pepe meme, which has existed on the internet for at least a decade, and used it as a form of protest against their enemies, to great effect.

In the 21st century protests, marches and their inevitable outcome, the riot, are now the reserve of angry, impulsive minority groups, which gives them the unconscious appearance in the European psyche of being course, rash, or crude forms of political or social expression. The meme has become a vastly superior sophisticated form of protest or psychological warfare to Europeans. The blatant lack of ability to understand and use memes by minority groups is painfully obvious.

Typical ‘black meme’

There are many in the European struggle who puzzle at the apparent apathy of their people to enact a response to the current situation, and it may seem that this lack of interest amounts to their certain death, at the hands of more energetic groups. Europeans have been through everything at least twice, their racial memory – always picking up subtle cues from the environment – is well aware of the amount of energy one expends when organising protests and marches and the such, and the relative futility of them in the face of the enemy. Europeans have become more nuanced in their behaviour and less physically obvious in their response to situations in which they are threatened. Once they had crusades and decades long wars, then revolutions, civil wars, pogroms, and short, large-scale ground offensives – each time becoming faster and more precise in the execution of the solution to the problem at hand. Europeans have faced their enemy many times before, and to respond the same way each time would be madness.

Europeans play politics like chess, reserve ones energy for the time when it will be most needed, and then, in as few decisive moves as possible, change the game. There is no longer any sense in bursts of energy, as these deplete vital stores and leave one unable to fully push back when needed. Instead, they suffer the spears and arrows, the constant insults and disrespect, the denigration and dismissal of their culture and the destruction of their civilisation, because they know deep down inside when the time is right they will strike back, and it will be devastating.

The Skeptics and the Spirit of Gravity

For those of us on the alternative right, the stakes are high. It’s easy to be caught up in the hopelessness of the seemingly inevitable demographic collapse of Europe and North America, to bemoan the entrenched factions of globalists and progressives against whom no man can publicly stand without having his personal life destroyed. We dash ourselves against the walls of a sinking ship, raging against the dying of the light by “redpilling” new converts, protesting publicly, and all manner of other means by which we try with all our strength to reverse the fatal direction in which the West has turned.

But every once in a long while, we get a break from all that. We get a chance to clash with a group other than the ideology busily engaged in flooding our lands with third world migrants. And recently, just such an opportunity for rhetorical fencing arose in the form of the so-called “skeptic community” and their crusade against the encrouchment of race realist thought amidst their ranks.

RageAfterStorm, former skeptic

Let’s recap some recent events:

A young, attractive, female YouTube star going by the pseudonym RageAfterStorm had developed a significant following for her standard Skeptic™ content: picking the ever-present low-hanging fruit of Islam, Feminism, and general SJW mockery. Such channels have for some time been appreciated (if not particularly lauded) by Alt Right commentators as ideological gateways, stepping stones on the road to further disillusionment with the progressive frame.

And in this case, oh dear, how right they were.

After numerous blasé videos which earned her some 90,000 subscribers, Rage made a momentous decision. She uploaded a video entitled “Race is Real”. The contents were nothing new to the alt right; some basic IQ data on blacks in the US and Africa, some statements on genes related to “abstract” thought taken straight out of Rushton and Murray, and some general pro-white sentiments expressed throughout.

For us it was, in the words of Van Jones, a “nothingburger”. Encouraging, perhaps, that yet another skeptic had trod the road of hard facts all the way to rudimentary identitarianism. But nothing more than that.

For the skeptics, however, this was nothing short of earth-shattering.

A young female member of their community, who had fully ingratiated herself to them and firmly established her place amongst them, had sent a lightning bolt of heretical truth right through the beating heart of their movement. This truth, the hard reality of racial disparities in intelligence, could not be allowed to gain a foothold. Such ideas could lead to acknowledging group collective interests, shattering the radical atomized individualism that lies at the core of skeptic thought.

So, grim-faced and sure in their resolve, they donned the mantle of SJW behavior and set about the destruction of Rage’s online persona. They mass flagged her videos, leading to takedown notices and the deletion of her channel. They swarmed her social media accounts, dozens threatening to dox and kill her, leading to the deletion of those accounts as well. And of course, the coup de grâce was prominent members of the skeptic community, such as Jeff Holliday and the infamously petulant manchild Kraut and Tea publicly bashing her as a racist, bigoted, xenophobic traitor to the cause.

Cuck and Tea

This display has nauseated the Alt Right and, for the moment, drawn our attention away from the ongoing drama in the Trump administration. So let us at long last take a look at the so-called “skeptics”, what they believe, and why they ought to be opposed.

I doubt anyone could put it better than Morgoth did when he described the skeptic community as “a bunch of bullshitters who believe in nothing”; all the same however, I shall endeavor to try.

The notorious Nietzsche

In Nietzsche’s infamous magnum opus, Also sprach Zarathustra, there is outlined a concept termed the Spirit of Gravity. This is the force which governs and subdues the untermensch, which dictates to them the doctrine of self-loathing and weakness. Overcoming the Spirit is the great trial of the protagonist, and the means by which the Nietzschian ideal is illustrated.

At its core, the Alt Right is a desperate yearning for greatness in the European people, a desire to raise them out of this malaise of self-destruction and into a new chapter. In doing so we have to preserve our life against the enemies who seek to destroy us, embodied in the hordes of nonwhites given the opportunity by the modern Left. But there is another group in play here, another faction with its own role to play, and they are the true untermensch, the men whose taproot in Eden has been cut, the men for whom any attempt at self-love and self-actualization offends their sensibilities: the Skeptics™.

Carl Jung, psychologist and philosopher

The archetype of the skeptic is young, atomized, and nihilistic. He feels no connection nor sense or commonality between himself and his ancestors. He sees no reason to respect their wishes for how their descendants ought to live, or more importantly, that their descendants should live at all. He feels no love or loyalty for his race – in fact he likely holds them in contempt, for the crime of conquering and defeating other peoples, something done ironically for the sake of these very ungrateful, petulant descendants. He closes his eyes to the reality of other races’ tribal behavior, only turning to his own folk and saying “Do not defend yourselves, do not cling to your own life and land. Don’t you know that you have visited evil on the rest of the world?”

He is ruled absolutely by the Spirit of Gravity, that lowest of instincts which tells a man to lie down and die rather than face the truth. He is worthy of contempt.

Afterword: I highly recommend watching Millennial Woes discuss the ongoing debate between the skeptics and the alt right here, and reading Morgoth’s excellent analysis of the situation here. Thanks for reading my very first post, more to come!

On Defectors

With every movement, it is inevitable that there will be defectors and detractors. Whether that’s someone genuinely changing their minds or an infiltrator pretending to have a change of heart, it has to be something we handle in a healthy manner. We can’t force anyone to believe anything, so the primary focus should be on how we respond to these situations.
A balance must be met. We cannot just ignore people leaving our ranks, but we cannot make it out to be a bigger deal than it actually is. When it comes down to it, most people are entirely replaceable. The movement is not hinging on any one person, and acting like it does gives them too much credit.
In my opinion, such actions should be met with clear, calm denunciation, and then ignored. If they aren’t fighting for us or explicitly against us at that point it’s a waste of time, energy, and concentration to continue focusing on them. However, we should have responses to any criticisms they rose ready, because the left will assuredly use those arguments against us.

I think that Eli Mosley made some good points in regards to this, there’s a full thread:

I’d like to address the people who backed out of the movement post-cville and the ones who stood strong. People like @bakedalaska & others:

— Eli Mosley (@ThatEliMosley) September 12, 2017

He is 100% right. None of us are ever going to be able to unlearn the things we have. Those that fall away either never believed it in the first place, or they are in denial to themselves. I for one, will not live a life like that.
To those of us deeply involved in the movement, this isn’t just some game. If you’re thinking of “joining the alt-right” just because it’s trendy or edgy, don’t. There are many sacrifices that you will have to make if you do, and you will only walk away with a tarnished reputation if you decide to leave. I wish that it weren’t like this, but that’s how things work now.

An Honest Look at the Alt-Right

If you are like many people, in America and around the globe, you believe that there is a negative aura around the so called, “Alt-Right”. You may believe we are all in the Ku Klux Klan, evil racists, or Neo-Nazis. The media will show you the images of those men in wizard robes and the ones carrying a Nazi flag. However, you are seeing 0.1% of the Alt-Right. I will come right out and say it, I, along with a majority of the Alt-Right, disapprove of these people. I not only see them as somewhat dumb, but also destructive. They know what they are doing is hurting public image and they continue to do it. Racism and hate are not what we are about at all. In fact, quite the opposite is true.

The Alt-Right is not about hating other races or anything along those lines. To me it is about recognizing that all races are different. It is to acknowledge that race is a real thing that differentiates different peoples. The Alt-Right is simply an advocate for the white race. Just as the Hotep movement and the NAACP is for the black race, UnidosUS is for Latinos, and yes… Zionism is for the Jews. If you look at all these groups I just mentioned, it can be assumed that there are a minority of people in those groups that may be extreme and evil, right? The same goes for the Alt-Right.

I’m hoping this isn’t hard for some to believe, but I am, in fact, just a normal guy. I’m a senior in high school, I have a lot of friends and I’m involved in various school positivity clubs. My friends are very diverse in ideas, and I, indeed, have a few friends who aren’t white. I don’t hold it against them that their opinions differ from mine, or let it take away from the fact that they are good people at heart. Even if we argue or debate topics, that doesn’t mean I hate them. This is important on all levels of social interaction. Open debate and the welcoming of diverse ideas is one of the founding principles of the United States. Just because my ideology may not fit into the normal realm of US politics, doesn’t mean that my group shouldn’t have a platform to speak our minds, without fear of backlash.

Now, what might separate the ideas of myself and the ideas of other advocacy groups? We believe that to preserve this beautiful diverse culture that everyone has, we keep them somewhat removed from each other. Now the magnitude on this is debatable, whether it is separating by cultural communities, balkanized states, or separate countries all together. I know this is not the pro-multiculutural society that we live in today, but in my personal opinion, it can decrease a lot of tension between groups of people. This tribalistic tendency is only natural. Rather than forcing different races to intermingle and fight, why not let nature sort it out?

If anyone reading this can take anything from this article, it is this. The Alt-Right recognizes a difference in race. This being said, our goal is to advocate and preserve our race. Though our individual ideas may differ on how to do this, our goal is the same. If we are not able to complete this goal, it may mean the eventual destruction of the White race. I’m hoping that I was able to shine some light on our ideas and show that we aren’t as far fetched as people make us out to be.  Rather than automatically berating and hating us, next time, hear us out. Instead of beating each other senseless in the street, maybe we could have a real discussion.

 

If anyone has any questions or comments on the article, the best way to reach me is on twitter @MacTonight_

 

How I found the Far-Right…. Or rather, how it found me.

Imagine this, I’m a young man of the age of 16, for the most part apolitical. When I did discuss politics I took a somewhat neo-conservative view on things. I used to be very into gaming, just loved the thrill of it. One day a friend of mine brought up how it was questionable that Battlefield 1 was adding things and people that made absolutely no historical sense. At first, I told him, “Who the fuck cares? It’s just a game who will take it as historical fact?” Over the course of the next few weeks, he showed me more and more examples of history being revised. It started to show a pattern that these revisions were being done to push an agenda. This agenda was not based on fact, reason, or history. It is pushed on to ignorant people, to give them a false sense of historical fact, create the illusion that diversity is power, and make it seem like multiculturalism has always been a part of European history.

Naturally, all this information was rough on me. I started noticing things every single day, that held these same principles. It was as if my third eye was finally open. I started to realize that not only was history being revised, but Western culture, architecture, and people, were systematically being destroyed.

During this period of my transformation from normism to a defender of the West, I took up a sort of Civic Nationalism approach to politics. This was all happening around election time. I believed that if someone could adapt to American ideals, then they could, in turn, become an American citizen. I was listening to a lot of Mike Cernovich at the time (I know), which gives you some insight into my way of thinking. I should mention, this friend of mine, has been slowly nudging me further and further right over the course of a year, and after the election, this was especially true.

Somewhere along this timeline, my friend introduced me to people like Richard Spencer, Mike Enoch, and Jared Taylor. I was skeptical of these people at first. I mean, I had always been a little biased towards race, but I never took it as far as basing my ideology on it. I really don’t know how it happened, but all I can say is that it didn’t take long before I was hooked to the idea of the Alt-Right. The sense of truly making a difference in the world encompassed me. I can honestly say that this was the best thing that has happened to me. The movement has made me more religious, more caring, and more knowledgeable about the world around me. It has made me realize what is propaganda, lies, and fallacy. In this regard, it has made me a philosopher (Self Proclaimed). I have been able to use logic and reason to create my own ideas. I can notice a bad argument almost instantly. No longer am I the ignorant child I once was, instead I use my ignorance as a drive for knowledge.

Even though the past 2 years has drastically changed me, I am not content with the 18 year old young man I am today. I will keep expanding my knowledge, growing, becoming stronger, and continue to become wiser. It is by no means easy to take on this task. It takes more self reflection and learning than may be comfortable for the average person. However, if you have the will, you can make a change worth happening. Not some progressive, HOORAY change, but a real one. One that impacts our future. Keep reading, keep learning, keep questioning, and keep lifting. Never give up, because the world as we know it, quite literally depends on us.

 

If you have any questions about my experience, any general questions, or need advice, don’t hesitate to get a hold of me on Twitter @MacTonight_ I will always answer within a few hours.

 

 

 

Antique Social Justice

If you ever doubted that Uncle Adolph was anything other than the last great White prophet, then you haven’t read Mein Kampf.

Written in 1925, his incredible observation skills about the group that he called the Social Democrats, but who we in the current year know as Social Justice Warriors, only goes to show that the enemy we face today, is not a modern phenomenon, but an ancient adversary to our people, an energetic force not subject to the laws of time and space, but the laws of nature.

From page 56, ‘I understood the mental terror which this movement exercised on the population which could neither morally nor psychically resist such attacks. Social Democracy, at a given signal, directs a bombardment of lies… They persist in their proselyting efforts and calumnies towards the adversary who seemed most dangerous, till finally the nerves of those who had been attacked give out and they, for the sake of peace, bow down to the hated enemy.

But the fools will not find peace after all. The play begins again and is so often repeated till the fear of the mad dog paralyzes them by suggestion. As Social Democracy knows, from its own experience, the value of strength, it assaults mostly those in whom it scents a trace of that rare material. On the other hand, it praises every weakling of the other side, sometimes cautiously, sometimes more boldly, according to the mental qualities they appreciate or suspect. It is less afraid of a powerless, irresolute genius than of a strong man of even moderate intelligence. Most of all it recommends those who are weaklings in mind and power. It knows how to create the appearance as though this were the only way in which peace could be maintained; yet relentlessly it conquers one position after another…’

Consider the case of someone such as Tim Hunt, the genetic scientist who bowed apologetically to the pressure exerted upon him by this force, and lost everything. Apologies will neve appease this energy, it feeds from the weakness unconsciously displayed in a submittal.

From page 58, ‘These tactics are based on an exact calculation of all human weaknesses; their result must lead to success with almost mathematical certainty, unless the other side also learns to fight poison gas with poison gas. Weak natures have to be told that it simply means ‘to be or not to be’… The importance of physical terror against the individual and the masses also became clear to me. Here, too, we find exact calculation of the psychological effect. The terror in the workshops, in the factory, in the assembly hall, and on occasion of mass demonstrations will always be accompanied by success as long as it is not met by an equally great force of terror. Then, of course, the party will cry havoc; scornful of State authority it will now call for it, so that in most cases and in the general disorder, it will reach the goal that is, it will find some idiot of a higher official who, in the stupid hope of in this way gaining, for the future, perhaps the favor of the dreaded enemy, helps to break the adversary of this universal plague.’

Later in the book, he goes on to exclaim “imagine mein shock” when he realises that much like today, the leaders of the Social Democrats are also largely drawn from a non-European group of people, who will go on to take centre stage in the post-war demonization of our prophet.

Woke af, woke AH.