When Life Gives You Lemons, Detox.

‘It is said that we are born alkaline, and die acidic.’

Brown is the colour of stagnation. Where a river is free and wild its water is white, whereas, if it is brackish and stagnant, it is brown. When it rots, food goes brown, and when it passes out of the body, devoid of any goodness, it is also brown. In Iridology – the study of the eye for the purposes of determining the health of an individual – brown stains or spots in the eye signify stagnation within the body, through the build up of toxins in the organs. In general, mammals are born with blue eyes, and blue eyes are most definitely seen as a sign of purity, much to the chagrin of brown people.

It is generally agreed that in order to build a lasting and virtually indestructible ethnostate, we must first seek to remove the toxins that pollute our society. Society is a super-structure of the bodies within it, so if the bodies themselves are toxic, then the society will also be the same. Therefore, in order to detoxify our society, and our civilisation, we must first begin with the individuals within it. It may be a controversial idea, but on close inspection I think it quite adequately explains why less white, blue-eyed societies are more prone to stagnation, and ultimately, failure.

The lemon is our first step towards detoxification, and the reversal of the degeneration that leads to stagnation. 

Begin your day by squeezing one whole, organic lemon into a pint of fresh, filtered water. It will not only hydrate you, which has many benefits alone, but as lemon is acidic, it causes the body to create a more alkaline environment. This is the first battle ground on which our fight against the acidic, stagnant environment preventing the ethnostate from being realised will be fought. 

Acidosis, the increase of acidity within the body, is partly the result of our (((toxic environment))) and our (((modern lifestyle))). Lack of sleep, the consumption of too many acidic foods, and heavy metals in our atmosphere all lead to an increase in acid levels in the body, which creates inflammation. An acidic system causes the cells, and the body to degenerate. Inflammation and acidosis have been shown to play a major role in heart disease, stroke, cancer, and no end of common physical ailments.

Because the mind and body are connected, the increased alkalinity in the body will gradually lead to a clearer mind, which will encourage one to seek out more ways to detox, or decrease acidity within the body. Each stage of detoxification will create a more focused, cleaner mind and body, and combined with exercise one will be on the path to becoming a healthy cell within the corpus of society. And if each of us remove some of those toxins from within, we will see them being removed from without. This is how the ethnostate should be built if we wish it to last, and if we wish to bring down the zio-pharmaceutical, zio-chemical and zio-agricultural order once and for all.

At the end of the day, just before bed, fill another pint glass with filtered water and squeeze another lemon into it, so that your body is alkalised during sleep, which is the most important part of the day, as this is when your body is able to start repairing cellular damage.

As I am currently investigating and partaking in this topic, I will be discussing the next stages of detox over time, but to begin with two lemons a day is a very simple and effective way to work towards building a healthy ethnostate, from the roots up.

Advertisements

The Issue of Hyper-Tolerance

In recent history, mainstream western society has placed a high value on inclusiveness. This preference is evident throughout popular culture.

It is currently considered more worthwhile to be sympathetic than it is to be accurate. There exists a ridiculous social condition where the status quo rests on tolerance. However, this tolerance extends only to others who also share the same “tolerant” values.

Is this true tolerance?

The value placed by society on critical thinking and cautious tendencies is significantly less than that placed on personal preference and tolerance in the present era. This tendency is hindering scientific education and progress, while also casting its dark shadow over the socio-political landscape.

There appears to be a widespread idea that “negativity” is inherently bad, and to be avoided. As a society we often say “yes”, when we should be saying “no”. This is an indication of excessive reliance on being tolerant.

Utilizing political correctness as the ideal for managing society fails to address the many problems actually inherent to our biological and social realities. Such an attitude inherently implies rejecting unpleasant facts, as well as fostering a general avoidance of the negative, an unwillingness to “feel bad”, and a crippling tendency of being unable to bear unpleasant objective experiences that must be endured in order to solve problems.

Objective critical evaluation is crucial to any sort of genuine integrity, and should synergize with the ideals of group advocacy, and the affirmation of individual preferences. These are both very important principles, neither should be neglected or blown out of proportion.

The issue with excessive reliance on tolerance is the spread of an insidious belief that all that is needed to have integrity is to be easygoing, sympathetic, and to proudly display one’s personal preferences.

Perhaps these may be admirable things, as the world definitely needs a reasonable degree of tolerance and self-expression. However, this social tendency has reached such extremes that it encourages insane levels of degeneracy. This tendency is also easily exploited by politicians and pundits, who use it to push aside many issues of profound importance.

There are some who believe themselves to be better and more enlightened than others, simply because they are more tolerant. This surface openness simply conceals a covert intolerance. Such individuals are secretly intolerant towards criticality, towards “no” itself! They affirm themselves and others, but are not willing to accept the need to reject, to forbid, to exclude, and to evaluate the world objectively.

We cannot simply discard that which we do not prefer, without examination, if we wish to have any legitimate understanding of the world. Nature is both nurturing and cruel, allowing personal preference to be expressed, while also balancing such preference with the objective realm of fact and necessity.

We must seek integrity within – a state of awareness that presents an unclouded mirror of Nature to our awareness – in order to truly solve the problems faced by our tribes, communities, nations, and the world itself.

The false integrity of superficial tolerance can only avoid difficult truths, because it would be too painful to address them directly. Likewise, being too critical, playing the “skeptic” (or the nihilist) is simply another trap, one that arises when one avoids subjective advocacy and places excessive reliance on objectivity.

For one to discover this integrity, one must come face to face with the shadow within, and embrace it.

Through this exploration of the hidden biases we hold, we can begin to perceive our “blind spots”, thereby achieving a greater state of wholeness, as well as a more encompassing awareness of the majesty and terror of existence itself.